Skip to content

American Patriots Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips Respond To Bill Barr

American Patriots Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips Respond To Bill Barr

American Patriots Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips Respond To Bill Barr

In a recent statement made by former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr, he expressed concerns about the claims made by American Patriots Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips regarding election integrity. While Barr acknowledged that there were some irregularities and fraud cases, he maintained that there was no widespread fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. However, Engelbrecht and Phillips firmly stand by their assessment and believe that Barr’s statement is not reflective of the reality they uncovered.

Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of True The Vote, and Gregg Phillips, founder of Votestand, have been actively working to ensure transparency and accuracy in elections for years. Their organizations focus on analyzing voter data, identifying potential irregularities and fraud, and ultimately striving for secure elections. Throughout their investigations, they claim to have found significant evidence of widespread voter fraud, including dead people voting, double voting, and ineligible voters casting their ballots.

Engelbrecht and Phillips argue that Barr’s conclusion is premature and incomplete. They state that their findings, along with sworn affidavits, eyewitness testimonies, and data analysis, provide substantial evidence that warrants a thorough investigation into the alleged fraud. They believe that dismissing their claims without a comprehensive review undermines the integrity of the election system, causes disillusionment among the American public, and perpetuates doubts about the democratic process.

For Engelbrecht, the concern lies not just in the 2020 election but also in the long-lasting impact it could have on future elections. She believes that addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring a fair and transparent democratic process. In her response to Barr’s statement, Engelbrecht emphasized the need for a comprehensive and independent investigation, conducted by individuals with no political bias, to restore trust and confidence in the electoral system.

Phillips also highlights the importance of further examination, pointing out that many of the claims made by Engelbrecht’s organization have yet to be fully investigated. He argues that dismissing these claims prematurely would be an injustice to those who reported these concerns and the integrity of the democratic process.

Engelbrecht and Phillips call for a non-partisan commission, consisting of both Democrats and Republicans, to thoroughly investigate their claims. They assert that only an impartial examination can bring forth the truth about the alleged irregularities and fraud, ensuring the validity of future elections.

Critics argue that Engelbrecht and Phillips’ claims have been widely debunked and that their findings lack substantial evidence. However, the duo maintains that their research provides a strong basis for further investigation and that unanswered questions about the 2020 election have the potential to undermine public trust.

As the debate around election integrity continues, it is important to consider and evaluate the claims made by individuals like Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips. The allegations they present deserve a fair and unbiased examination to ensure that the democratic process is upheld and that any potential flaws are addressed. Only through a comprehensive investigation can we determine the validity of their findings and restore public faith in the electoral system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *