Sarah Huckabee’s Rebuttal Was An “Insult” To President Trump’s Triumphant Four Years – Steve Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic

In a recent episode of Steve Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and his guests discussed Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ rebuttal to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address. The panel, which included former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, was highly critical of Sanders’ rebuttal, with Bannon calling it an “insult” to President Trump’s “triumphant” four years in office.

The panel’s criticism of Sanders’ rebuttal was largely centered around the fact that they believed it lacked the “fire” and “passion” that they felt Trump’s speech contained. Bannon was particularly critical, saying that Sanders’ rebuttal was “tepid” and “forgettable”, and that it “did not reflect the greatness of the Trump presidency.” Lewandowski echoed Bannon’s sentiment, saying that Sanders’ rebuttal “did not do justice” to the accomplishments of the Trump administration.

The panel also took issue with the fact that Sanders’ rebuttal was “too focused” on attacking the Democratic Party, rather than highlighting the successes of the Trump administration. Bannon argued that Sanders should have used her time to “sell the achievements” of the Trump administration, rather than “attacking the Democrats.” Lewandowski echoed this sentiment, saying that Sanders should have used her time to “praise the president” and “celebrate his successes.”

The panel’s criticism of Sanders’ rebuttal was not limited to the content of her speech. They also took issue with the fact that Sanders’ rebuttal was only 10 minutes long, compared to Trump’s speech, which was over an hour long. Bannon argued that Sanders should have used her time to “sell the achievements” of the Trump administration, while Lewandowski argued that she should have used her time to “praise the president” and “celebrate his successes.”

Overall, the panel was highly critical of Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ rebuttal to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address. They argued that her rebuttal was “tepid” and “forgettable”, and that it lacked the “fire” and “passion” of Trump’s speech. They also argued that it was “too focused” on attacking the Democratic Party, rather than highlighting the successes of the Trump administration. Finally, they criticized the fact that Sanders’ rebuttal was only 10 minutes long, compared to Trump’s speech, which was over an hour long.