Skip to content

Judge Threatens Hunter Biden’s Lawyers with Sanctions for Attempting to Defraud Court

Judge Threatens Hunter Biden’s Lawyers with Sanctions for Attempting to Defraud Court

Hunter Biden’s legal representatives may face penalties for purportedly deceiving the clerk involved in the First Son’s criminal trial, as per the Daily Mail’s report. Delaware’s Judge Maryellen Noreika has directed Biden’s attorneys to justify their actions by 9 p.m. on Tuesday or confront possible sanctions.

The accusations state that an individual from Biden’s attorney Chris Clark’s former law firm contacted Sam Grimes, the Delaware clerk, pretending to be from Smith’s lawyer, Theodore Kittila’s office. The person is said to have requested the clerk to eliminate the original filing, which also included 448 pages of Congressional testimony from the two IRS investigators involved in the case, as reported by the Daily Mail.

Subsequently, the documents were removed and sealed, triggering a “second outraged letter” from Kittila. Kittila told the judge in his letter, “We immediately reached out to the clerk’s office, only to find out that someone claimed to be a representative from my office and requested the court to expunge this from the docket.”

Chris Clark vehemently denied the accusations in an “incensed” email response, alleging that, “the clerk independently decided to withdraw the filing.”

Nonetheless, Kittila presented an email copy from the Delaware clerk to support his assertions. He named Jessica Bengels as the individual and provided her contact number. The clerk responded by saying, “She claimed to be associated with Theodore Kittila and stressed the urgency of removing the document,”

Judge Noreika, infuriated by the alleged misconduct, commanded Hunter’s attorneys to justify their actions on Tuesday afternoon. The order stated, “It seems the caller falsely portrayed her identity and affiliation to persuade the clerk’s office to eliminate the amicus materials from the docket.”

Consequently, it was demanded, “on or before 9pm today on July 25, 2023, counsel for defendant needs to provide reasons why sanctions should not be contemplated for false representations to the court.”

Hunter Biden’s lawyers responded to the judge’s demands for an explanation on Wednesday.

BREAKING: Hunter Biden’s attorneys respond after they allegedly lied to the Delaware clerk to get key documents against Hunter retracted.

Hunter’s plea deal is now in jeopardy.

According to Hunter’s lawyers, the situation is just one big misunderstanding.

“We stand prepared to…

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 26, 2023

“We stand prepared to address any inquiries of the Court to rectify this misunderstanding,” the lawyers claimed. “Should the Court consider this letter and the accompanying materials to be an insufficient explanation for this misunderstanding, we request an opportunity to more fully brief and be heard on the issues of concern to the Court.”

The judge did place a temporary seal on Smith’s filing, implying it won’t be accessible to the public until the finalization of Hunter Biden’s plea hearing on Wednesday.

Jason Smith, the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, earlier submitted a plea suggesting the judge to reject Hunter Biden’s liberal plea bargain related to minor tax offenses. Smith — along with numerous critics — asserted that the president’s son was given special treatment.


‘Love You Brother’: A Close Personal Friend of Hunter Biden’s Worked in Prosecutor’s Office Assigned to His Case

*” indicates required fields

This article contains commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *