In the wake of IBM’s recent guidelines on the rollout of a digital euro, intended to bolster the European Central Bank’s (ECB) digital currency initiatives, privacy and civil liberties concerns are becoming increasingly pressing. While IBM meticulously outlines a series of recommendations for the integration of the digital euro into the eurozone’s financial infrastructure, it leaves open questions about how these measures could compromise individual freedoms.
IBM’s plan, which aligns with the European Commission’s (EC) legislative proposals, emphasizes the importance of building on “existing rails.” However, the company’s push for further expansion raises concerns that a centralized digital currency could exacerbate surveillance capabilities and government control over personal finances. The focus on “simplicity” as a catalyst for adoption conveniently omits a detailed exploration of the trade-offs in privacy and autonomy that may result from this supposed simplicity.
While IBM envisions a “multi-level” intermediary landscape for the digital euro, the role of intermediaries themselves poses potential risks. Emphasizing collaboration between large and small intermediaries to facilitate adoption is all well and good, but there is little mention of how this ecosystem would protect end users from data collection, tracking, or worse.
English 
Español de Venezuela