Sometimes things fit together so easily and perfectly that you can’t be blamed for thinking of Tetris. Yesterday was one of those days.
In response to the segment on the current round of riots in France a Yesterday’s SCRuser Dusty did the following to comment:
Dusty underestimated US perfidy in this case, which is understandable since we can’t know everything they’re up to. There is simply too much meddling.
I took the opportunity to reply to Dusty, returning to SCR #112 which had a segment on the spread of “Wokism” in France. From SCR #112:
While it has made inroads into French politics, it is nowhere near the level of success it has achieved in the US and Canada.
Like the last panel, “Media and Universities: In Need of Reform and Reevaluation?” began, Diallo took the opportunity to argue the opposite position. On stage with her were a political scientist and two philosophy professors, one of whom was the moderator, Perrine Simon-Nahum. Diallo is a well-known and polarizing figure in France, a telegenic advocate of identity politics with a large following on social media. He draws parallels between the French and American criminal justice systems (one of his documentaries is called From Paris to Ferguson), arguing that institutional racism affects his nation the same way it does the United States, most notably in discriminatory stop-and-frisk policing. Her views would hardly be considered extreme in America, but here she is seen in some quarters as a genuinely subversive agent..
Diallo IS a subversive agent, and can be considered American thanks to what Chatterton Williams shares with us later in the article:
In 2010, the US State Department invited French politicians and activists to a leadership program to help them strengthen the voice and representation of ethnic groups that have been excluded from government. In attendance was Rokhaya Diallo, who many of her critics still use as proof that she is a trained proselytizer of American social justice propaganda. (In 2017, under pressure from both the left and the right, Macron’s government called for her removal—as Diallo told me, “cancelled” her—from an advisory council of the government, apparently on the basis that race and religion-based political organization contradicts key principles of French republicanism and secularism, or secularism.)
But in a classified memo published on WikiLeaksformer US Ambassador Charles H. Rivkin laid out the pragmatic and self-interested rationale for the program, part of what he called a “minority engagement strategy”:
French institutions have not proven flexible enough to adapt to an increasingly heterodox demographic. We believe that if France, in the long run, does not successfully increase opportunities and provide genuine political representation for its minority populations, France could become a weaker, more divided country, perhaps more prone to crises and with an eye toward inside, and therefore less. capable ally
What do you call a person who goes to a foreign country to be coached by it on how to exacerbate divisions at home? Anyways….
Here’s the key once again:
In 2010, the US State Department invited French politicians and activists to a leadership program to help them strengthen the voice and representation of ethnic groups that have been excluded from government. In attendance was Rokhaya Diallo, who many of her critics still use as proof that she is a trained proselytizer of American social justice propaganda.
Her wiki bio lists her as “…author, filmmaker, and activist for racial, gender, and religious equality.” The News from New York described her as “one of the most prominent anti-racist activists in France”.
He has all the right views, and it’s interesting to note how they line up perfectly with the liberal and leftist views emanating from the US. She is one of the main defenders of the Americanization of French politics, culture and society. The US State Department trained her well, and she is awarded to make your offer.
As usual, I went to the UK Guardian to see what they had to offer about the riots in France, and lo and behold this appears on my screen:
It is quite coincidental that a UK publication turned to an arsonist trained by the US State Department to take a sober view of what is happening in France.
A sample:
Nahel’s death is another chapter in a long and traumatic story. Whatever our age, many of us French descendants of post-colonial immigration carry within us this fear combined with rage, the result of decades of accumulated injustice. This year, we commemorate the 40th anniversary of a pivotal event. In 1983, Toumi Djaidjaa 19-year-old from a suburb of Lyon, was the victim of police violence that left him in a coma for two weeks. This was the genesis of the March for Equality and Against Racismthe first anti-racist demonstration on a national scale, in which 100,000 people participated.
For 40 years, this movement has not stopped calling out the violence we see directed at working-class neighborhoods and, in general, at blacks and people of North African descent. Crimes by the police are at the root of many of the uprisings in France’s poorest urban areas, and it is these crimes that must be condemned first. After years of marches, petitions, open letters and public pleas, a disgruntled youth can find no other way to be heard than to riot. It is hard to avoid wondering if, without so many uprisings in the cities of France, Nahel’s death would have attracted the attention it has. And like Martin Luther King rightly said: “A riot is the language of the unheard.”
Of course the American agent will quote MLK. This is part of the Americanization process. MLK is completely alien to France and its history, but that won’t stop people like her from trying to reframe it anyway. To them, we are all Americans………in one way or another.
Nor do their efforts have anything to do with justice or “the fight against racism.” Its function is to castigate and shame France and the French for facilitating the country’s transformation into little more than a de facto US state, complete with funny language and good bagels, wine and cheese.
Where in the West has “anti-racism” succeeded? Instead of succeeding in its stated goals, all it does is hyper-racialize politics and society, erode rights, and create many jobs for an otherwise totally unproductive academic class. They will insist that racism is constantly “on the rise”, which is very selfish of course.
The French are right: Diallo is a foreign-trained subversive. The tragedy is that their subversion is the result of a deliberate program courtesy of an ally, the US.
English 
Español de Venezuela