Israel Wisely Did Not Listen To Biden Or Harris

In a recent article for The Daily Caller, Shoshana Bryen argues that Israel’s recent military actions against Hamas, particularly the elimination of senior Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, represent a significant success for the nation’s security. As Israel celebrated the Sukkot holiday, Bryen contends that this decisive operation highlights the importance of Israeli self-defense, especially in light of external pressures from the U.S. administration.

Israel’s Actions Against Hamas

The article opens with a focus on Israel’s military operation that successfully targeted Sinwar, a notable figure in Hamas. Bryen posits that this development is not only a blow to Hamas but also a critical measure for the protection of Israeli citizens, aligning with Israel’s longstanding commitment to self-defense against terrorism. By acting decisively, Bryen argues, Israel sends a robust message regarding its right and capability to secure its sovereignty.

Critique of Biden and Harris’s Stance

Bryen does not shy away from criticizing President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris for their handling of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She characterizes their approach as potentially harmful to Israel’s security interests. The author claims that adhering to the Biden-Harris administration’s advice would have compromised Israel’s military capabilities, thereby jeopardizing its safety in an already volatile region.

U.S. Policy and Israel’s Sovereignty

Within the article, Bryen emphasizes the significance of Israel’s autonomy in decision-making regarding its security strategy. She argues that the U.S. should not impose constraints that may hinder Israel’s ability to address threats from terrorist organizations. The author believes that a strong and independent Israel is essential for its survival and for regional stability.

Support for Israel’s Self-Defense

Central to Bryen’s argument is her unwavering support for Israel’s right to self-defense. She asserts that external pressures should not dictate how Israel protects its citizens. The military actions taken against Hamas are framed as a necessary response to ongoing threats and violence, underscoring that a proactive stance is imperative for national security.

Broader Geopolitical Context

Bryen places Israel’s recent military operations within a larger geopolitical framework, suggesting that these actions contribute to regional stability. By taking decisive measures against Hamas, she argues, Israel can better secure its position and respond to threats independently of potential international criticism. This perspective highlights the complexities of international relations and the necessity for Israel to prioritize its national interests.

Conclusion

In summary, Shoshana Bryen’s article presents a compelling case for Israel’s choices in the face of political pressure from the Biden-Harris administration. By advocating for Israel’s right to self-defense and emphasizing the importance of its sovereignty, the author calls for recognition of the realities on the ground and the necessity of robust security measures to ensure the safety of Israeli citizens.