The first search result I found was the account of DC_Drain. When I first saw him, his post about my article had about 250,000 impressions, thousands of retweets, and hundreds of comments. This was after a few hours. Right now, the post has 549,800 views, 15,700 likes and 7,284 retweets. DC_Draino has 830,500 followers. In other words, more than half of his followers saw the post.
The next post I came across was from Rasmussen reports. At the time I first saw it, his post had about 2.3 million views, 10,000 likes, and hundreds of comments. Right now, it has 3 million views, 21,100 likes, 10,900 retweets and 917 comments. Not only that, but they made two follow-up tweets to the article, garnering 237,400 and 334,900 views, respectively. Rasmussen has 442,600 followers. His initial post is almost seven times his total number of followers. What’s interesting is that most of the posts in his feed have 10,000 views or less. Sometimes, they reach around 20,000. Only rarely do his tweets reach the millions, and only on the biggest stories, like when FBI Director Chris Wray admitted to the existence of documentation of a pay-to-play scheme involving Joe Biden.
Other influencers participated in the event. Dinesh D’Souza commented on the article, receiving over 1,000,000 views in less than 24 hours. Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams added his two cents for another 200,000 views. Juanita Broadderick, Kari Lake and Patrick Byrne also joined in, with between 200,000 and 350,000 views each.
Despite all this attention, the story has had no impact in the media. None of them are talking about it, despite the fact that interest on Twitter equals or exceeds that of the stories they cover. Scott Adams asked in his tweet: “What is the rejection of this?” The answers were overwhelming.
One simply wrote: “Debunked.” He was repeatedly asked to answer how and where, but refused to answer any of the questions. Others tried to pretend that JIW was not a real newspaper. False and easily proven. Someone who identified himself as a data scientist tried to suggest that the algorithms couldn’t exist because New York is a “bottom-up” state, where all the data goes into the county rolls. This means that all the counties had to conspire together to create the algorithm. False again. If you had read the article, you would know that the algorithms appear to have been imposed at the state level, quite possibly without the knowledge of state officials, and definitely without the knowledge of county officials.
So far, there have been no official responses from anyone in New York state or local government. That is, apart from a couple of county commissioners who were amazed when I showed them the algorithm on their rolls and one who said he wasn’t surprised (I think he was).
The point is that voter fraud remains one of the most interesting stories in America today. As much as the media and our government want us to forget, America is not forgetting. We want to know what happened, and we will find out, no matter how hard they try to stop us.
Español de Venezuela 
English 