The Biden administration has been considering the possibility of bringing back migrant family detention centers, which has caused uproar among progressives. Many have voiced their concerns over the potential harm and trauma that can arise from detaining families, especially children.
The proposal under consideration is to use the Fort Bliss military base in Texas to house families seeking asylum. The base can reportedly hold up to 10,000 people, and it is believed that using the facility would alleviate overcrowded facilities at the border.
However, many advocates for immigrant rights and progressives have criticized the move, arguing that it goes against the Biden administration’s promises to address the root causes of migration and to provide humane and fair treatment to asylum seekers.
The history of family detention in the United States is a complicated one, with various administrations imposing different policies that have impacted families seeking asylum in different ways. This article will explore the history of family detention, the Biden administration’s recent proposal, and the arguments presented by both sides.
A Brief History of Family Detention in the United States
Family detention in the United States began in the 1980s when the federal government established the first family detention center in Pennsylvania. The facility was designed to detain families seeking asylum from the civil war in El Salvador.
During the George W. Bush administration, family detention became more widespread with the opening of the T. Don Hutto Residential Center in Texas in 2006. The facility was designed to house entire families, including children, in what was described as “prison-like” conditions.
The Obama administration also utilized family detention during the 2014 surge of unaccompanied minors coming across the southern border. Several family detention centers were established, including the Karnes County Residential Center and the South Texas Family Residential Center.
The use of family detention under the Trump administration was perhaps the most controversial. President Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy resulted in the separation of families at the border, with parents being held in immigration detention centers while their children were placed in separate facilities.
The administration also sought to expand family detention, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposing a regulation in 2018 that would allow for families to be detained indefinitely.
The proposal was met with widespread outrage from advocates for immigrant rights and progressives, who argued that detaining families, especially children, was inhumane and violated their human rights.
The Biden Administration’s Proposal
The Biden administration has signaled that it is considering using the Fort Bliss military base in Texas to house families seeking asylum. The proposal is reportedly part of an effort to alleviate overcrowding at border facilities.
The plan has faced immediate backlash from progressives who argue that it goes against the administration’s commitment to undo the harmful policies of the Trump era and to provide humane treatment to migrants.
Many have also pointed out that the use of military bases for detention is problematic in itself, given the history of abuse and neglect that has taken place in military detention facilities.
Critics of the proposal have also pointed out that family detention is not an effective deterrent to migration and that it can exacerbate trauma and harm to families, especially children.
One of the main arguments made by those opposed to family detention is that it goes against the principle of family unity. Advocates for immigrant rights argue that families seeking asylum should be allowed to stay together and that detention, even in a family unit, can cause immense harm to children and families.
Studies have shown that children who experience detention can suffer from anxiety, PTSD, and other mental health problems. They are also at risk of falling behind in their education, losing access to healthcare, and experiencing neglect and abuse.
Progressives Respond
Progressives in Congress and advocacy organizations have responded strongly to the Biden administration’s proposal. Many have sent letters to the administration urging them to reconsider and to find more humane and effective solutions to the border crisis.
Several advocacy organizations have organized protests and rallies to draw attention to the issue and to call on the administration to take action.
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) wrote that “we have a responsibility to ensure that the United States respects the human rights of migrants, even those seeking asylum.” She went on to argue that the use of military bases for detention goes against that responsibility and that the administration must find more humane solutions.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) also sent a letter to DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, urging him to halt plans to use military bases for detention and to work with Congress to develop alternatives.
Conclusion: The Debate Over Family Detention Continues
The debate over family detention at the border is far from over, with the Biden administration’s proposal serving as the latest example of the ongoing struggle to find humane and effective solutions to the crisis at hand.
Progressives and advocates for immigrant rights argue that the use of family detention goes against our values as a nation and that it does more harm than good. They call on the administration to find alternatives that prioritize family unity and respect the human rights of all migrants.
Those who support the use of family detention argue that it can help alleviate overcrowding at border facilities and can act as a deterrent to migration. However, many advocates argue that detention is not an effective deterrent and that it can cause trauma and harm to families, especially children.
As the debate continues, it is clear that the Biden administration will need to find solutions that address the root causes of migration and that prioritize the well-being of all migrants seeking asylum. The use of family detention may be one of many tools at their disposal, but it should not come at the expense of human rights and compassion.
English 
Español de Venezuela