Aren’t you ready for this: Protocolists euthanized COVID-19 patients with ventilators and sedatives “to save other patients”, death rate > 50%? Up to 70% of COVID-19 deaths due to ventilators
for James Lyons-Weiler
Substack of popular rationalism
ACTIVATION ALERT: If you lost a loved one to COVID-19 and doctors tried to ventilate your loved one early, read no further. Have someone close to you read this, read the entire article, and describe the article to you in a quiet, calm environment. You will need a friend to help you with this.
If you are a doctor who has been persecuted for doing the right thing, perhaps lost your license or is being threatened, send this Wall Street Journal to your lawyers and thank you for not giving in to demands to kill patients on ventilators. and with strong sedatives.
Either way, I encourage PR readers to read the WSJ article for yourselves and see if you agree or disagree. Leave a comment about your take. am i wrong
WSJ article: McCullough, Kory, Lyons-Weiler and others were right.
In a mind-blowing article published by the Wall Street Journal, (Hospitals are pulling back from early Covid treatment and going back to basics) doctors admit to ventilating patients who didn’t need it as part of their protocol, get it, not as a treatment that might benefit the patient, but as a fruitless and insensitive way to try to stop the spread of COVID- 19. 19.
“Last spring, with less knowledge about the disease, Doctors often preventively put patients on ventilators or gave powerful sedatives largely abandoned in recent years. The goal was to save the seriously ill and protect hospital staff from Covid-19.
Hospital treatment for the most seriously ill now looks more like it did before the pandemic. Doctors are waiting longer before placing patients on ventilators. Patients are given less powerful sedatives, and doctors check more often to see if they can stop the drugs altogether and re-dial the amount of air ventilators push into patients’ lungs with each breath.“
“We were intubating sick patients very early. Not for the benefit of the patients, but to control the epidemic and save other patients,” said Dr. Iwashyna, “I thought it was horrible.”
Yes, humane euthanasia is illegal. Above all for the benefit of other patients. It should feel awful.
“Last spring, doctors put patients on ventilators in part to limit contagion at a time when it was less clear how the virus spread when masks and protective gowns were in short supply. Doctors could have used other types of respiratory support devices that didn’t require risky sedation, but early reports suggested that patients using them could spray dangerous amounts of the virus into the air.said Theodore Iwashyna, a critical care physician at the University of Michigan and Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
“Further research found that alternative devices to ventilators, such as delivering oxygen through nasal tubes, were not as risky for carers as previously thought. Doctors also gained experience with Covid-19 patients, learning to spot signs of someone who might suddenly become seriously ill, some said.”
The WSJ article describes a study conducted that now allows doctors to predict who needs a ventilator and who doesn’t:
“It found that more doctors are now following pre-pandemic protocols, which have reduced the number of deaths and shortened the time patients spend on ventilators,” said the HCA’s chief medical officer.
“Before the pandemic, between 30% and more than 40% of ventilated patients died, according to research. The numbers were much higher in the first hotspot of the pandemic in Wuhan, China. As the pandemic grew, US hospitals reported case fatality rates in some cases of approximately 50% for ventilated Covid-19 patients.“
(25.6 – 7.6)/25.6 = 70% of COVID-19 deaths due to ventilators? Did up to 50% of those who died in hospital not have COVID-19?
“A study of three New York City hospitals found that the death rate for all Covid-19 patients dropped to 7.6% from 25.6% between March and August after accounting for younger patients and healthier in summer New York hospitals were less crowded in August than during the April surge, which could increase mortality, the study authors wrote in October in the Journal of Hospital Medicine.The study also suggests that patients may have benefited from new drugs and improved treatment, they said.
Add to that the fact that up to 50 percent of the “cases” of COVID-19 were just “PCR positive” false positives. This means under the “care” of protocolists, perhaps as many as 50% of people who died with a positive PCR test result died from a false positive PCR test. Either they never had COVID-19, or they became infected in the hospital after going home for ten days with a respiratory illness other than COVID-19 that, if properly treated with outpatient care , would never have led to hospitalization.
In an extraordinary rarity of “fact-checking” that went well during the height of the COVID-19 disinformation, USA Today actually verified Dr. Scott Jensen’s reports that hospitals were receiving financial incentives that he considered “playing the system,” citing numerous so-called fact-checking opinion websites.
“We evaluate the claim that hospitals are paid more if patients are listed as having COVID-19 and on ventilators as TRUE,” they reported in April 2020.
“Hospitals and doctors pay more for Medicare patients diagnosed with or thought to have COVID-19 without a laboratory-confirmed test, and three times more if patients are placed on a ventilator to cover— los. the cost of care and lost business as a result of a change in approach to treating cases of COVID-19.”
It’s REAL early treatment, stupid
We were right. Many of us were right. The protocolists should have listened.
Cruel beyond measure: Now that vaccinees are being hospitalized far more, ‘guidelines are just guidelines’
From the WSJ article:
“Researchers and doctors continue to study patients with Covid-19 who need ventilators, and some experts have called for flexibility in the pre-pandemic standards for doctors to decide how to calibrate ventilators. It’s customization, that’s the key word,” he said. says John Marini, a professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota. “Guidelines are just guidelines.”
Anyone paying attention to the public health takeover of allopathy understands the reality that guidelines are only guidelines until someone at HHS or the White House decides to shut you down with personalized medicine.
We need tough, tough investigations with consequences, and activists must write bills that tie the hands of protocolists to prevent them from ever again killing one patient to save another, under the threat of criminal charges. murder
We need legislation for “on-demand” scripts for off-label drugs that patients want for life-threatening infections, regardless of “FDA Approval” (the FDA, by definition, does not have to “approve” off-label scripts.
Plus: there are helmet-based ventilation options – which are much less invasive, patients don’t feel like they’re being attacked or strangled – and come with free training.
Posted on January 24, 2023
English 
Español de Venezuela