Former President Donald Trump is getting ready to take legal action against the Justice Department, seeking $100 million in damages for what he and his legal team claim was “political persecution” during the unprecedented raid on his Mar-a- Lake in Palm Beach, Florida in 2022.
Trump's lawyers allege that the attack was carried out with a clear intent to harm him and that it violated established protocols for investigations involving former US presidents.
Red Beach Nation Freedom-Loving Beachwear – Save 10% with code RVM10
In a note obtained by Fox NewsTrump claims “criminal conduct by the United States against President Trump” and outlines his intention to sue the Department of Justice.
The raid, which took place on August 8, 2022, was part of a federal investigation into Trump's alleged mishandling of classified records. Special counsel Jack Smith subsequently filed 37 felony charges against Trump, including charges of withholding national defense information, obstruction of justice and making false statements. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
However, US District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed Smith's case against Trump, ruling that Smith's appointment was illegal and violated the Constitution's Appointments Clause.
That ruling led Trump's attorney, Daniel Epstein, to file a notice to sue the Justice Department. The department has 180 days to respond and make a decision. If no resolution is reached, the case will move to the federal court for the Southern District of Florida.
Epstein stressed that Trump's legal action serves not only to defend the former president, but also to defend the rule of law and hold the government accountable. Epstein argues that the attack at Mar-a-Lago violated Trump's right to privacy and that the decisions made by Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray were motivated by political persecution rather than good law enforcement practices.
Epstein's filing alleges that the actions of the DOJ and the FBI constituted an intrusion of privacy, malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Epstein maintains that the attack was inconsistent with established protocols, which require consent from the target of the investigation and notification of their attorneys. It also claims the DOJ violated Florida law and invaded Trump's privacy.
In addition, Epstein argues that the prosecution of Trump was unlawful, citing the Supreme Court's ruling that a president is immune from prosecution for official acts. He asserts that with Judge Cannon's dismissal based on improper appointment and funding, there was no constitutional basis for the subsequent attack or impeachment.
Epstein claims that Trump suffered significant damages from the legal costs, estimating them to be $15 million, and plans to sue for punitive damages. It claims that the misconduct of the DOJ and the FBI amounts to election interference aimed at undermining Trump's ability to be re-elected.
The Justice Department declined to comment on the matter. Epstein argues that this case serves as a warning against the government's potential to trample on the rights of all Americans if left unchallenged. He believes defending Trump's rights is crucial to preventing further abuses by the government.
In conclusion, former President Donald Trump is seeking $100 million in damages from the Department of Justice for the Mar-a-Lago attack, accusing the government of political persecution.
Trump's lawyer argues that the attack violated established protocols and amounts to an invasion of privacy.
The case also challenges the legality of the prosecution against Trump and seeks punitive damages.
English 
Español de Venezuela 