If you simply reverse the order of the statements, this could read like strong crime fighting.

Youth programs cannot deter crime per se. But they can provide a bit of a safety valve and can give the government credibility to clamp down on the worst behavior.

So it’s not bad to refer to the city’s programs. But the order of operations remains: we do X for the community and we will continue our efforts. However, this means that there are less than zero excuses for Y. Since you continue to do Y, you will now face the full force of punishment Z. Thank you, good night.

Chicago seems to be stuck in reverse thinking, and it seems to me that they have social barriers designed against reducing crime. But in addition, Johnson does not appear as an engineer.

Source link