Comparing the Nazis’ treatment of people in an effort to achieve desired results with the behavior of modern-day awakened fanatics will be resented by modern-day Nazis. However, my analysis will be accepted by informed people. The historical Nazis left their vile mark on the world, but were stopped and all but eliminated, while modern workers are dismantling a thriving society with little opposition. America and the world will never be the same because of the virulent, venal and even vicious virus of wokeism.
Think with me along these lines: the dangerous, disastrous and deadly system of the Nazis compared to what the workers are doing.
Would you allow the state to kill your disabled child to avoid pain and make life easier and better for you and your family?
Or to save the government health care system from the belly up!
Where did you or the state get the authority to do the above? Does any state or jurisdiction have the right to abuse a defenseless citizen?
USSANews.com reported that a Canadian man was euthanized by health officials after being hospitalized for “hearing loss,” according to reports. He had texted his brother asking him to “get him out” of the hospital, but it was too late. He was killed by those allegedly called and trained to save lives and “to do no harm”. In reasonable and humane societies, their euthanasia would be considered murder. However, the “authorities” in medicine and politics seem to be all-powerful.
Both medicine and politics must have their wings clipped. This will keep them closer to earth and common sense.
In 1920, the Germans Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche published a world-shaking book with the English title Permission to Destroy Life Devoid of Value or Permitting the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life. It addressed the legal relationship between suicide and euthanasia and extended it to killing the mentally ill. The book suggested that killing a patient was justifiable when it led to the saving of other lives, especially when the patients in question had no value to themselves or to society. The book advocates killing the mentally ill or intellectually dead, mostly because these people were a drain on society: useless cannibals.
When Hitler came to power legally, he wanted a pure nation of strong, blond, blue-eyed Germans. Those who could not contribute to this vision of National Socialism had to go. Many thousands left the country. Others stayed and were sent to labor camps. The Nazis used Binding and Hoche’s legal and medical research to support their elimination of the weak, incompetent, insane, etc. And this was supported by the German people. A 1925 survey of German parents of disabled children indicated that 74% were in favor of euthanizing their children! The book helped legalize suicide and euthanasia.
If you think it couldn’t happen here, you better think about the survey above: in the land of Martin Luther and thousands of Catholic and Lutheran churches.
Before Hitler’s rise to dictator in 1934, grotesque laws were framed as public health measures aimed at strengthening society. The German euthanasia program was officially adopted in 1939 and quickly accelerated to strange extremes.. The author of Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide, Robert Jay Liftin, revealed that Nazi policy underwent several modifications.
“Of the five identifiable steps by which the Nazis carried out the principle of ‘life unworthy of life,’ coercive sterilization was the first. The killing of ‘disabled’ children in hospitals followed. Then the killing of “deficient” adults, most of them collected from psychiatric hospitals, in centers specially equipped with carbon monoxide gas. This strange project was extended to “deficient” inmates in the concentration camps.
The Nazis did the above and more based on the best medical science of the time. Sick and disabled individuals were unproductive members of society and drained from society far more than they contributed. Besides, it was a lot of trouble to take care of them!
More than half of all German doctors became early members of the Nazi Party, outstripping party enrollments from all other professions. This suggests to me that MD could refer to morally deficient. National Socialist officials might say, “Hey, we’re just doing what the medical experts tell us the science requires.”
Well, we sure have heard that many times recently.
The world had embraced the “science” of eugenics. The Germans, yes, even the Nazis, thought they were good people acting on solid evidence and a solid ethical foundation. These defendants engaged in genocide, but they did so under the protective cover of medical authority and official legitimacy. Almost anything can be justified if it is based on “following the science”.
Surely we know, right?
Our government has allowed electric shocks; lobotomies (Rosemary Kennedy, sister of late President John F. Kennedy the most famous victim); cocaine was sold as candy in drugstores and was used in the first Coca-Cola in the late 1880s; Bayer began advertising an aspirin with heroin in 1898 until 1913; forced sterilization; forced inoculations; etc., which are compared to Nazi policies.
However, no government has the authority to slaughter innocent unborn babies; allowing, even encouraging, assisted suicide; sterilize people against their will; authorize immorality (heterosexual or homosexual) of any kind; legalize unwanted medical treatment; allowing children to have their genitals cut off or mutilated; encouraging and sponsoring gender change, which cannot be done; and forward
While we question the morality and competence of Hitler’s experts, we must also question modern health officials and also politicians who think they can make a pretend child become a real child.
No, government officials in Germany and the US do not have the authority, but they do have the power because they carry the guns.
The phrase “life unworthy of life”, which first appeared in Binding and Hoche’s book, was essential to Nazi ideology. The two authors, a lawyer and a doctor, were not politicians and certainly not National Socialists. They were academics dealing with a very delicate subject: Does the State have the right to kill some people for the good of the many? Does the state have the right to decide when a life is unproductive?
Between 1934 and 1939, the number of people sterilized ranged from 200,000 to 400,000 Germans to maintain a clean or pure race. Between 1933 and 1945, approximately 15,000 deaf people were forcibly sterilized. In Canada they are killed as the news revealed.
According to Hoche, “some living people who were brain damaged, intellectually disabled, autistic (although not recognized as such at the time) and mentally ill were ‘mentally dead’, ‘human ballast’ and ’empty shells of human beings.” Hoche believed that killing these people was useful, as they made no contribution to society and were considered disposable.
They were useless eaters.
New Nazis walk among us today and are considered intellectuals who teach at major American universities, receive generous salaries and benefits. The more awakened ones tell us that a child can decide what gender he wants to be. Furthermore, these confused children are entitled to hormone blockers and even have their organs cut off to lend credence to their crazy fantasies.
To hide a male sex organ before surgery (mutilation), Boston Children’s Hospital advises transgender teenagers as young as 13 to implement a “safer tab” to make their penis look like a vagina. It is recommended to tape with medical tape for this purpose; however, if the boys use duct tape, the hospital (which used to have an excellent reputation) added: “if you use duct tape, remember to shave (although not before, as this can cause irritation) so the tape doesn’t shave. pull the hair. Soak in a warm bath before removing to make the tape less sticky.”
These hospital officials are not only awake, but strange, even crazy. But double plate certified.
Furthermore, childbirth, monthly periods, and menopause are no longer strictly the responsibility of women, and these events can now be experienced by any man who desires them according to the most awakened of awakening. But then why would any sane man want such experiences?
American philosopher Peter Singer, professor of bioethics at Princeton University, and others have made similar arguments Any moment abortion up to weeks after delivery and Any moment euthanasia Singer declares, “It would be morally wrong to choose to have a disabled child.” He and other fuzzy, silly, fatalistic ethicists believe that allowing a disabled child to live is wrong. Therefore, if killing a hemophiliac baby has no adverse effects on others, in his opinion, it would be right to kill him.
Singer, not only awakened but also evil, has no problem with sex with the dead (necrophilia) as long as consent is given to the person while they are alive. Of course, sex with animals is acceptable. I’m not sure I need consent. Perhaps the movement of a dog tale is enough. But it gets worse, it always does. Singer told the ABC: “A woman has oral sex performed by her dog. I know women who have said they like it. The dog is free to do it or leave. There is no mastery over the dog. That to me it seems harmless.”
Note that having personal supremacy over the dog would be wrong, but kinky sex is acceptable.
To be clear, I have more respect for the dog than I have for the woman or the Singer, and under normal circumstances such disgusting subjects should not be spoken to by normal people; however, we are living in very unusual times.
Humans are responsible for living as humans and will one day give a personal account to a just and holy God.
University of California professor Kenneth Watt opined: “Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”
Watt, Singer and Company are far from harmless. As in Germany, strange, foolish and fraudulent scientists declared war on culture to replace it. The positions of tenured professors are safe no matter how unbiblical, un-American, unqualified, or stupid they are. Also, they are generally safe from being fired unless they are caught in bed with a dead girl or a living boy.
The roused bigotry is evident, as evidenced by watching almost any television show. The radicals have put the cult of culture and removed the civil from civilization. It almost makes me want to give up on the human race.
And he has lost his humanity.
See the link to the original publication article and more articles by Don Boys, Ph.D.
If you found this article informative, please consider a small donation to ours cup of coffee to help support conservative journalism, or spread it. Thanks.
Syndication source for the original RWR article.
English 
Español de Venezuela