![The main rule of COVID had little to do with science [VIDEOS]](https://www.redvoicemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024.01.10-09.40-redvoicemedia-659f0ebfbe8a6.jpg "The main rule of COVID had little to do with science [VIDEOS]")
In a surprising admission (if you haven't been paying attention) during his testimony before Congress, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the oft-disgraced immunologist and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, acknowledged certain shortcomings in the scientific basis for certain COVID-19 social distancing guidelines. The revelation has sparked widespread concern among conservative lawmakers and citizens.
According to a recent report in New York PostDuring the hearing in Congress, Dr. Fauci admitted that certain social distancing recommendations lacked a solid scientific basis and appeared to have materialized without adequate justification. This admission has raised serious doubts about the effectiveness and necessity of certain restrictive measures imposed throughout the “pandemic”.
The debate centers around the widely accepted six-foot social distancing guideline that has served as a cornerstone of COVID-19 prevention strategies across the country. Legislators, reportedly Breitbart, faced Dr. Fauci with evidence suggesting that there were no empirical studies to support the effectiveness of the six-foot rule. In response, Dr. Fauci admitted that the basis for this guideline was that it “just came out.”
Critics argue that this admission calls into question the arbitrary nature of the guidelines that have been imposed on businesses, schools and communities. The violation of personal liberties and the harmful impact on the economy have been issues of concern for conservative voices since the beginning of the pandemic.
Self employed or employer? Find out how to claim a MAJOR tax credit
Conservative lawmakers, echoing the sentiments of their constituents, have expressed frustration at the lack of transparency surrounding the development of the COVID-19 guidelines and the apparent inconsistency in their application. The revelation that certain social distancing measures were adopted without a clear scientific basis further heightens these concerns.
In response to Dr. Fauci's admission, many are calling for a reevaluation of current COVID-19 policies and calling for a return to evidence-based decision-making. They argue that a more targeted and balanced approach, guided by scientific research, should be implemented to ensure the protection of public health while safeguarding individual liberties and the economy.
As the debate continues to unfold, it's clear that Dr. Fauci's admission has added fuel to the fire of skepticism among people with higher-than-room-temperature IQs about managing the COVID-19 “pandemic”. The need for transparency, accountability and a thorough review of the scientific basis behind public health policies has become paramount in the search for a way forward.
Here's a glimpse of what the public missed when Fauci testified behind closed doors yesterday: the same answers he gave in that statement… https://t.co/B1wjqnXS2l pic.twitter.com/1uLR9c6kPm
— Te𝕏asLindsay™ (@TexasLindsay_) January 9, 2024
Nazi Secret History That Changed America Forever | Operation Paperclip
Prepare for anything: Introducing the emergency medical kit for any crisis
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Red Voice Media. contact with us for guidelines for submitting your own comment.
English 
Español de Venezuela 