Skip to content

RFK Jr Says He Was Denied Secret Service Protection By Biden Admin

RFK Jr Says He Was Denied Secret Service Protection By Biden Admin

In a surprising revelation, Robert F. Kennedy Jr has claimed that the Biden administration is denying him Secret Service protection. Kennedy Jr, the son of former Senator and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, made the statement on Twitter, expressing his disappointment at not receiving the same level of security as other presidential candidates.

Kennedy Jr, a prominent environmental attorney and vaccine critic, tweeted, “Since the assassination of my father in 1968, candidates for president are provided Secret Service protection. But not me.” This has raised eyebrows and sparked a debate about the rationale behind the Biden administration’s decision.

Typically, presidential candidates are entitled to Secret Service protection once they declare their candidacy. However, it seems that Kennedy Jr’s request for such protection has been met with silence and eventual denial. This is in stark contrast to the standard turnaround time of 14 days for pro forma protection requests.

After waiting for 88 days without any response, Kennedy Jr’s campaign made several follow-ups, only to be met with the disappointing news that their request had been denied. Secretary Mayorkas stated, “I have determined that Secret Service protection for Robert F Kennedy Jr is not warranted at this time.”

This decision has raised questions about the criteria used to determine whether a candidate should receive Secret Service protection. Kennedy Jr’s campaign argued that their request included a comprehensive 67-page report from a leading protection firm, detailing specific and well-established security and safety risks that went beyond generic death threats.

The denial of Secret Service protection has left Kennedy Jr and his supporters frustrated and concerned for his safety. Given his family’s tragic history with assassinations, it is understandable that they would seek additional precautions to ensure his well-being.

However, the Biden administration has yet to provide a clear explanation for their decision. Critics speculate that it could be politically motivated, given Kennedy Jr’s outspoken views on vaccines and environmental issues. Others argue that it may be a bureaucratic oversight or an attempt to distance the administration from controversial figures.

In any case, the denial of Secret Service protection raises broader questions about the treatment of political candidates and the extent to which their safety and security should be guaranteed. The role of the Secret Service in protecting presidential candidates has evolved over the years, particularly in response to the increase in threats and acts of violence against politicians.

The Secret Service was initially established in 1865 to combat the counterfeiting of U.S. currency. It wasn’t until 1901, after the assassination of President William McKinley, that its responsibilities were expanded to include the protection of the president. Over time, the agency’s mandate expanded further to include presidential candidates and their families.

The assassination of Robert F. Kennedy’s father in 1968 was a pivotal moment in the history of Secret Service protection. Before his death, it was not customary for presidential candidates to receive such protection. However, the tragedy prompted a reevaluation of security protocols and led to a change in policy.

Since then, candidates for president have been provided with Secret Service protection, recognizing the unique risks and threats they face throughout their campaigns. The role of the Secret Service in protecting candidates has become even more crucial in recent years, given the rise in politically motivated violence and the proliferation of social media platforms.

Given this context, Kennedy Jr’s denial of Secret Service protection raises concerns about the criteria used to evaluate such requests. The campaign’s inclusion of a comprehensive report on specific security risks should have warranted a thorough review by the Biden administration.

Some speculate that Kennedy Jr’s controversial views may have influenced the decision. His stance on vaccines, in particular, has sparked heated debates and drawn criticism from public health officials. However, the denial of Secret Service protection should not be based on ideological differences and should instead prioritize the safety and security of all candidates.

Furthermore, the denial of Secret Service protection raises concerns about the potential risks and threats candidates face in the current political climate. Political polarization and the spread of misinformation have fueled hostility and violence, making it all the more crucial to ensure the safety of candidates and their ability to engage in open and democratic discourse.

The Biden administration’s decision to deny Kennedy Jr’s request for Secret Service protection should be scrutinized and reviewed. It is essential to maintain transparency and fairness in assessing the security needs of candidates, irrespective of their political views or controversial positions.

In the absence of Secret Service protection, Kennedy Jr and his campaign must rely on alternative security measures to safeguard their safety. This places an undue burden on the candidate and raises questions about the equity and consistency of security protocols.

Ultimately, the denial of Secret Service protection for Kennedy Jr raises broader questions about the state of democracy and the need to ensure the safety and well-being of political candidates. As political campaigns become increasingly polarized and divisive, it is crucial to uphold the principles of fairness, transparency, and security.

The Biden administration should provide a clear explanation for its decision and reevaluate the criteria used to assess Secret Service protection requests. As we navigate the complexities of the political landscape, we must prioritize the safety and security of all candidates to preserve the integrity of our democratic processes.

In the case of Kennedy Jr, his family’s history with political assassinations makes it all the more imperative to address this issue promptly and comprehensively. We owe it to them and to the ideals of democracy to ensure that all candidates are protected and can participate in the political process without fear or intimidation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *