MAGA is fighting the mob and so are we…but we need your help. Join our growing army and click here to subscribe to Revolver. Or simply give the gift of Revolver select the annual subscription and select “This is a gift” on the next page. meIf you want to give more during this critical time, you can make a one-time or recurring monthly donation donation — Whether it’s $1 or $1,000, every bit goes into the battle to save our great nation.
There is a lot of controversy, cover-up and conspiracy surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. So much so that sometimes it’s hard to keep up with what’s real or fiction. But a hearing held recently in Australia could hold the key to unlocking many of the mysteries surrounding the jab. We are learning that many elites did a different “job” than the rest of us. That’s the bombshell that emerged from a heated hearing where Australian senators grilled Pfizer employees who eventually admitted they took a “special” batch of the vaccine that wasn’t available to the rest of the public.
How diabolical
Pfizer’s spokesman admitted that company employees received a “special batch” of Covid-19 vaccine, materially different from the vaccine distributed to the rest of the population. The shocking revelation came during a Senate hearing in Australia, when Pfizer’s spokesperson revealed that the Big Pharma giant imported a special batch of COVID-19 vaccines just for its employee vaccination program.
Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts led the cross-examination of Pfizer Australia’s country medical director, Dr Krishan Thiru, and head of regulatory science, Dr Brian Hewitt, with his pointed investigations eventually leading Dr Thiru to admit that Pfizer employees did not receive the normal vaccine.
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer employees received a *special batch*…different from what was forced on the general population 🚨🚨🚨 pic.twitter.com/CDww6wxFif
— Pelham (@Resist_05) August 4, 2023
The ember continued:
Pfizer grilled by Australian senators, forced to admit its employees had a different batch to the publichttps://t.co/CM8EDM6dsK pic.twitter.com/gTWUIDVEFz
— Timothy Lassley wants paper ballots! (@TiMLassley) August 5, 2023
The piece goes on to explain that the revelation that Pfizer employees received a different Covid vaccine than was distributed to the general public might not be so surprising after all. Dr. Ugur Sahin, CEO of BioNTech, Pfizer’s vaccine collaboration partner, openly admitted on camera that he chose not to take the Covid vaccine. Senator Roberts also raised an interesting point: the pharmaceutical industry benefited significantly from the vaccination of the Australian population, and this was largely attributed to the government’s strict pandemic management approach that was closely aligned with the World Economic Forum. What vaccine did the WEF officials take?
Senator Roberts demanded to know what role Pfizer played in the government’s decisions to make vaccines mandatory for employment and its involvement in potential government bans on alternative treatments such as ivermectin.
“Pfizer has no involvement, had no involvement in the imposition of vaccine mandates … Pfizer has had no involvement in relation to ivermectin,” said Dr. Thiru.
However, the inquiry took a controversial turn when Roberts probed Pfizer’s confidential compensation arrangements with the Australian government, suggesting that taxpayers who funded the vaccine have a right to see details of what they bought.
“Does the indemnity you have with the government extend to offering you compensation in the situation where an employee is forced by their employer to get vaccinated and then suffers an injury? And if you have indemnity, I want proof” , Roberts asked.
Dr. Thiru maintained that the details of these agreements remain confidential, as per standard practice for contractual arrangements between the government and private organizations.
“Senator, any compensation agreement between Pfizer and the Australian government is confidential and we cannot discuss it in this forum,” Thiru said.
You have to admit that Big Pharma won the prize with these confidentiality agreements and lawsuit shields. Makes you wonder who else could have gotten their hands on a “special batch” right here in the US. After all, we’ve all seen celebrities and politicians roll up their sleeves for the cameras. Was it a show, as some have suspected all along?
SUPPORT REVOLVER — TO GIVE — SUBSCRIBE — NEWS SERVICE — GAB — GETTR — SOCIAL TRUTH — TWITTER
English 
Español de Venezuela