Facts are facts, even if they make a new presidential candidate Kamala Harris looks bad This fact is undeniable, no matter how much the dishonest media tries to obfuscate it: President Joe Biden appointed the Vice President to stem the tide of migrants in the US South border. period No room to move.
And the almost indisputable judgment is that he failed at the job. miserably The tide did not recede; it rose up and crashed in huge waves on our (figurative) shores.
It was March 24, 2021. Biden, in a White House meeting that included Harris, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, and Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, announced was calling on Harris to lead the administration's response to the growing number of migrants arriving at the US border. His job, he said, was to “stem migration to our southern border.” He also said he “agreed to lead our diplomatic effort and work with nations [to our South] accept returnees and improve the enforcement of migration at their borders, at their borders.”
Biden told reporters before the meeting that wanted Harris to be the point person on the border, to speak decisively for the administration. And in a call to journalists after the announcement, a senior official he told reporters unequivocally that Harris would focus on the historic increase in illegal border crossings.
Within hours, stories emerged in major news organizations making it clear that “Biden was giving her lead efforts to curb migration and the border” with dozens of elite news organizations referring to her as the “czar of the border”. This is an irrefutable story. It's all documented.
Yet an hour after Biden endorsed Harris last Sunday, news organizations and Democrats were vociferously saying that it was never the case that Harris was in charge of the border, that they never said he was the border czar and that the claim was quite a right…wing conspiracy.
axes, a popular online news organization in Washington, not only scrubbed part of its story from 2021 reporting that Harris was “appointed by Biden as border czar,” but also said in a note from the 'editor who had “incorrectly” labeled Harris as a frontier czar. At least he admitted that he originally called it that.
It was one of the most notably dishonest moments in American journalism, a once-revered industry that in recent years has lost people's trust to report the news fully, fairly and accurately. And it wasn't just axes. The gaslighting of readers across various news organizations has been equally repulsive, and may be the final straw in this relationship between readers and news organizations.
The News from New York warned readers Thursday, saying, “Ms. Harris was not actually appointed border czar, nor was she tasked with addressing the border issues that plague the border itself.”
That's not what Biden said. This is not what the press wrote and said.
Simply put, they either lied then or they are lying now.
For years, the national press has had so-called “disinformation bats” and used them to rush to say that social media platforms should not feature certain news or media outlets, almost all of which are center-right or conservatives, in their places. .
And now they engage in disinformation that discredits their own reporting. They need to call themselves out for misinformation. Either they are lying now or they were lying then.
Then they called Harris the Czar of the Frontier, and now they say he was not the Czar of the Frontier. This means that they were not very good journalists at the time. And so they need to address their reporters who said Harris was wrong.
It is a statement that their own product was wrong or is now wrong. It's one or the other.
What they don't understand is that most people are smarter than that, and that their explanation is, “Oh, you just want to help her.” Rest assured, if we didn't have an immigration problem, Harris would be with the fact that she's the border czar, and everyone knows it.
The same goes for “nonpartisan” GovTrack, an organization that bills itself as a government transparency website that tracks congressional voting records that decided late Wednesday night to delete its 2019 rating of Harris as the most liberal US senator at the top. room
GovTrack founder Joshua Tauberer told Fox News that the page was removed because it was not “a reliable portrayal of lawmakers' activity.”
Do it again for us? Is it saying that the very rating that is GovTrack's stock in trade, which has been on the site for years, is suddenly not accurate? If your rating isn't accurate, doesn't that call into question the entire GovTrack rating system? It can't be inaccurate just for her, but not for 99 other senators.
The truth is, he was absolutely right all along, but now it's so embarrassing for his candidate that GovTrack is falling on his own sword. However, the reality is that if voters didn't reject the far-left spiral that Biden has embraced since becoming president, Harris would rank as the most liberal senator in the country.
In short, two recognized institutions that are supposed to operate at the highest level of reliability not only scrubbed any evidence of their original reports and classifications, but somehow expected the general public to go along with it, all because the candidate preferred by the institutions would be damaged. by previous reports or classifications.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
All those reports were good until now they pretend it wasn't. And instead of standing behind their reports, they try to pretend it didn't happen. Which makes you wonder if they were terrible at reporting or is it fair now?
In the words of Al Gore, the fact that Harris is the czar of the border is an inconvenient truth. No matter how much they try to get rid of the discomfort, the truth, inviolable, remains.
English 
Español de Venezuela