On February 22, 2021, the New York Times reported that the Manhattan District Attorney’s office had obtained Donald Trump’s tax returns and was investigating him and his company for possible criminal activity. The news immediately sparked new speculation about the former president’s legal troubles and whether he could face criminal charges. Trump responded to the news in typical fashion, attacking his political enemies and claiming that the investigation was a politically motivated witch hunt. But what are the facts behind the story, and what does it mean for Trump and the American political system?
The Roots of the Investigation
The Manhattan District Attorney’s office has been investigating Donald Trump and his business empire for several years. The investigation initially focused on the role of Trump’s former personal lawyer and “fixer,” Michael Cohen, in paying hush money to two women who claimed they had affairs with Trump in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Cohen pleaded guilty to charges related to the payments, and he implicated Trump in the scheme. The president denies any wrongdoing.
The prosecutors expanded their probe to include other possible financial crimes, such as tax fraud and money laundering, related to Trump’s business dealings in New York City. The investigation is led by Cyrus Vance Jr., the district attorney of Manhattan, who has a reputation as a tough prosecutor who is not afraid to take on powerful people. Vance’s team has been quietly gathering evidence and interviewing witnesses for years, and the fact that they were able to obtain Trump’s tax returns suggests that they have a strong case.
The Significance of the Tax Returns
Donald Trump broke with decades of tradition by refusing to release his tax returns while he was president, claiming that they were under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and that he would release them when the audit was complete. However, there is no law that prevents someone from releasing their tax returns while they are under audit. Trump’s refusal to make his returns public fueled speculation that he had something to hide, such as financial ties to Russia or other foreign governments, or that he had engaged in illegal financial activity.
The fact that the Manhattan District Attorney’s office was able to obtain Trump’s tax returns suggests that they have evidence of criminal activity. The returns could reveal whether Trump lied about his income or assets on his tax returns, whether he undervalued his properties to avoid taxes or inflate his net worth, or whether he engaged in other fraudulent practices. Trump’s tax returns could also reveal whether he had financial ties to foreign governments or illicit sources of income. The returns could be a crucial piece of evidence in any criminal case against Trump or his company.
The Reaction from Trump and His Supporters
Donald Trump has always been quick to attack his political enemies, and the news of the tax returns and the investigation was no exception. In a statement, he called the investigation a “fishing expedition” and claimed that Vance was “headhunting” him. Trump also accused Vance of being a Democrat and suggested that the investigation was politically motivated. (Vance is a Democrat, but that is irrelevant to his role as district attorney.) The former president also claimed that Democrats were trying to “persecute” him for his policies and beliefs.
Trump’s supporters echoed his sentiments, with many calling the investigation a “witch hunt” or a partisan attack on the former president. Some claimed that the investigation was a distraction from the real issues facing the country, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or the economy. Others accused the prosecutors of violating Trump’s privacy or trying to overturn the results of the 2016 election. Some of Trump’s allies in Congress called for Vance to be investigated himself or for Republicans to push for laws that would prevent similar investigations in the future.
The Future of the Investigation
It is unclear how long the Manhattan District Attorney’s investigation will take, or what charges, if any, will be brought against Donald Trump or his company. However, the fact that the prosecutors have been investigating for years and have now obtained Trump’s tax returns suggests that they believe they have a strong case. It is also possible that the investigation could lead to charges against Trump associates or family members, or that civil penalties could be assessed against the Trump organization.
The investigation is not the only legal challenge facing Trump in his post-presidential life. The Senate recently acquitted Trump of charges related to the January 6 insurrection, but some Democrats are calling for him to be held accountable for his role in inciting the mob that stormed the Capitol. Trump is also facing a defamation lawsuit from writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims that he raped her in the 1990s. The lawsuit was allowed to proceed despite objections from the Justice Department, which had argued that Trump’s comments about Carroll were made as part of his official duties as president.
The investigation of Donald Trump and his business empire raises important questions about the rule of law, the limits of presidential power, and the accountability of the powerful. Some legal experts have criticized the lack of transparency and oversight in the tax system and have called for reforms that would prevent wealthy people from evading taxes or engaging in fraudulent practices. Others have called for stronger checks and balances on the executive branch to prevent future abuses of power or corruption. The fact that a former president could be subject to criminal charges shows that no one is above the law, and that justice can be pursued even against the most powerful people in society.
Conclusion
The news that the Manhattan District Attorney’s office has obtained Donald Trump’s tax returns and is investigating him and his company for possible criminal activity is a significant development in the ongoing legal saga surrounding the former president. The investigation raises important questions about the rule of law, the limits of presidential power, and the accountability of the powerful. Trump’s response, and that of his supporters, suggests that the investigation will be highly politicized and polarizing, but the fact that justice can be pursued even against the most powerful people in society is a testament to the strength and independence of the American legal system. The investigation is ongoing, but its outcome could have profound implications for the future of American politics and the principle of equal justice under the law.
English 
Español de Venezuela