Skip to content

Nobel Prize-winning scientist ‘fired’ for rejecting ‘consensus’ on man-made climate change

Nobel laureate Dr John Clauser, known for his work in quantum mechanics, has been denied the opportunity to speak at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) after expressing dissenting views on climate change.

The Co2 Coalition, a non-profit organization that advocates for the benefits of carbon dioxide, made the announcement following Clauser’s remarks on climate change during a speech at the Quantum Korea 2023 conference in Seoul, South Korea.

“Nobel Laureate (Physics 2022) Dr John Clauser was due to present a seminar on climate models at the IMF on Thursday and his talk has now been summarily cancelled,” the Co2 Coalition said in a statement. “According to an email he received yesterday evening, the director of the International Monetary Fund’s Office of Independent Evaluation, Pablo Moreno, had read the flyer for John’s July 25 zoom talk and canceled summary and immediate way the talk. Technically, it was ‘adjourned'”, adds the statement.

Dr. Clauser, whose pioneering work in quantum mechanics recently won him the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics, is best known for his “contributions to the foundations of quantum mechanics, in particular the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt ( CHSH). ) inequality, for the first experimental proof that nonlocal quantum entanglement is real (Freedman-Clauser) and for the formulation of the theory of local realism (Clauser-Horne),” states his biological entry in your website.

“Along with CHSH’s 1969 prediction, the 1972 Freedman-Clauser experiment is considered important enough that it has now been repeated by others, literally hundreds of times in a wide variety of configurations, in many laboratories around the world “, adds his biographical insight. . “It is now routinely done by undergraduate lab students as part of a standard physics curriculum. It is also widely considered for quantum mechanics, what the Michelson-Morley experiment is for special relativity.” .

However, Dr. Clauser was “fired” for sharing his views on climate change and the rampant misinformation about it being spread by the mainstream media.

“I don’t think there is a climate crisis,” Clauser said. “The world we live in today is full of misinformation. It is up to each of you to serve as judges, distinguishing truth from falsehood based on accurate observations of phenomena.”

According to the Co2 Coalition, Clauser has repeated this view in the past.

“In my view, there is no real climate crisis,” Dr Clauser said. “However, there is a very real problem of providing a decent standard of living for the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my view, is incorrect climate science.”

The Co2 Coalition shared part of an email from Clauser, addressing the organization after learning of the cancellation of his speech. In the email, Clauser expressed that Moreno, presumably an IMF official, informed Clauser of the decision, citing concerns that Clauser’s technical expertise might be too complex for him to understand.

In response to the incident, Dr. William Harper, one of the founders of the Co2 Coalition, expressed strong disapproval, calling it a shameful act of silencing Dr. Clauser’s voice.

Climate experts in 2022 published peer-reviewed research in the journal European Physical Journal Plus that shot down several baseless claims about “apocalyptic” climate change that have thrived in the mainstream press.

“Looking at the natural disasters since 1900 shown in Figure 8, you can see a very small number since the middle of the last century, when a sudden increase begins that stops towards the end of the 20th century to give way to a trend marked by a slight decrease”, say the authors.

“This trend is very strange: is it possible that natural disasters essentially appeared in the middle of the 20th century and showed such a dramatic growth until the end of the century?” ask the authors. “It should also be noted that this trend is at first sight ‘consistent’ with the growth of the planet’s global temperature.”

Now, relevant to this analysis is the statistical fact that deaths from natural disasters are down 99 percent from a century ago. Therefore, regardless of the various reasons for this fact, it is doubtful that the world will suddenly face the “existential danger” of climate change.

The authors further show that one of the main reasons for the increase in data points in many studies is that technological advances have increased the ability of nation-states to report on weather events and natural disasters.

“In support of this interpretation, there is also the growth of earthquakes, shown in Figure 9, which should have nothing to do with global warming and which exhibits a similar temporal trend to that of all other natural disasters “, the authors add.

“In our view, this confirms that the main reason for the increase in the second half of the 20th century is the growing reporting capacity of individual states and that, as this capacity has stabilized at a reliable level, the number of disasters has remained stationary or even decreased,” the study continues. “It is the same phenomenon that has already been observed for hurricanes and tornadoes.”

An innovative study seems to corroborate this problem of information overload. “Corrupted Climate Stations: Official US Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed,” finds shocking results: About 96% of US temperature stations used to measure climate change fail to meet “acceptable” and uncorrupted placement standards established by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

The research, conducted by The Heartland Institute, used satellite and in-person surveys to evaluate NOAA weather stations that contribute to official land temperature data in the United States. The study reveals that an alarming 96% of these stations are affected by localized urbanization effects, leading to heat bias due to their proximity to asphalt, machinery and other objects that produce heat

This violates standards published by NOAA and raises concerns about the accuracy of long-term climate warming trends in the country.

Anthony Watts, senior fellow at the Heartland Institute, who led the study, expressed concern: “With a 96 percent warm bias in US temperature measurements, it is impossible to use any statistical method to get a accurate climate trend for US data from stations. that have not been corrupted by misplacement show a warming rate in the US nearly halved compared to all stations.”

On page 17 of the report, a chart presents 30 years of data from NOAA temperature stations in the continental United States (CONUS). Yellow lines represent non-compliant station temperatures near artificial hotspots. The red lines show the “official” adjusted temperature published by NOAA. Blue lines represent recorded temperatures and trends from compatible stations.

Aggregated data from compliant stations show significantly less temperature increase compared to stations with faulty temperature readings and the NOAA “adjusted” anomaly line.

This seriously undercuts the prevailing bias in the mainstream media that supports global warming alarmism. These findings call for urgent action and greater adherence to scientific standards in climate data collection.

The planet is at relatively low global temperatures and carbon dioxide levels in Earth’s historical terms, according to peer-reviewed temperature data published by researcher CR Scotese and carbon dioxide data published by RA Berner of the University of Yale in the Geocarb III dataset (page 201).

According to these data sets, Earth’s current carbon dioxide level of 420 ppm (parts per million) compares with levels of more than 2,000 ppm in the Mesozoic Era and more than 4,000 in the Paleozoic Era. Earth’s average global temperature is about 13.9 degrees Celsius, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA), compared to nearly 22 degrees Celsius, the maximum temperature before the current Quaternary ice age that spanning much of the Mesozoic era and back again. through the periods of the Paleozoic era.

Life on earth flourished in both of these eras, despite much higher carbon dioxide levels and much higher average global temperatures. The Cambrian explosion of life approximately 544 million years ago began with some of the highest global temperatures and carbon dioxide levels on record.

Therefore, it is not far-fetched to claim that higher levels of carbon dioxide may correlate with the growth of life on earth. Certainly an esteemed scientist like Dr. John Clauser should be free to express his views on the matter.

NOW READ:

President Biden supports the plan to BLOCK THE SUN despite the planet being at historically low temperatures

*” Indicates mandatory fields


OPINION:
This article contains comments that reflect the opinion of the author.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish