Letita James received a lawsuit to censor pro-life abortion reversal facts [VIDEO]

In a lawsuit filed Tuesday, two pregnancy centers, along with a pro-life nonprofit, have filed charges against Democratic Attorney General Letitia James, claiming she illegally tried to censor discussions related to the abortion reversal pill.

Veteran-Owned Prepper Beef Company Offering Unprecedented Memorial Day Discounts

This legal action came in response to a lawsuit filed by James in May, in which he accused 11 pregnancy centers of spreading “misleading” information to pregnant women about progesterone, a supplement used to potentially reverse the effects of a chemical abortion. The National Institute of Family and Life Lawyers, Gianna's House and the Choice Care Center, the plaintiffs in that lawsuit, claimed that James was overstepping his authority in an effort to suppress the speech by pro-life advocates on the abortion-revocation pill, considering this. effort as “unconstitutional,” according to the complaint.

The lawsuit stated: “Knowing that the challenged statements about progesterone treatment are supported by research, the Attorney General has targeted centers that provide information about this option because of their pro-life stance and the nature of the his communication. This is evident from his reference to some of these studies in his lawsuit against other pro-life pregnancy centers in state court.”

6 tips you need to know about the consequences of self-defense

James had claimed that pro-life centers were engaging in “deceptive acts and practices” and had stated that “abortions cannot be reversed” in a press release. It also demanded centers remove information about progesterone reversal from their services, claiming they lacked “scientific evidence” of its effectiveness.

Contrary to James' claims, pro-life advocates highlighted the extensive history of using progesterone to prevent miscarriages and supported its effectiveness in reversing chemical abortions, citing a success rate of 64 -68% They also referred to studies indicating the safety and effectiveness of progesterone in reversing abortion pills, including one from 2018 that reported that 48% of women who “underwent progesterone treatment within 72 hours after taking mifepristone” were able to have live children.

Alliance Defending Freedom legal counsel Gabriella McIntyre, representing the plaintiffs, emphasized the importance of allowing women the freedom to reconsider their decision about abortion and to be informed about the option to use this legitimate treatment, which can save lives. McIntyre stated, “The New York attorney general, however, is doing everything he can to deny women the freedom to make that decision. Women should have the choice to reconsider going through with an abortion, and the centers The pro-life pregnancy advocates we represent in this case honestly inform them of this choice. We urge the court to affirm the freedom of pregnancy centers to inform interested women about this life-saving legal treatment.”

This lawsuit highlights the contentious debate surrounding the abortion pill and the freedom of pro-life organizations to discuss this option with women seeking guidance in making their reproductive health decisions. The legal battle is poised to bring to the fore crucial issues related to the rights of both pro-lifers and pregnant women, reigniting the ongoing discourse about women's choices, informed consent and the limits of intervention government in health-related discourse.

ZStack – Make Your Immune System Clean, Strong and Resilient (Use Code RVM for Discount)

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Red Voice Media. contact with us for guidelines for submitting your own comment.