Kamala Harris Lacks Intelligence

In a recent article titled Kamala Harris Is an Idiot, Charles C. W. Cooke of the National Review presents a biting critique of Vice President Kamala Harris, questioning her competence and ability to fulfill her duties effectively. Cooke’s examination, framed through a conservative lens, raises significant concerns regarding Harris’s performance in office.

Criticism of Competence

Cooke asserts that Harris is “wildly, catastrophically, incontestably out of her depth” in her role as Vice President. This accusation points to a perceived severe lack of competence and capability, suggesting that Harris is not equipped to handle the responsibilities that come with her office. Such a strong assertion sets the stage for a broader analysis of her actions and decision-making skills.

Specific Incidents

One notable instance highlighted by Cooke is Harris’s response to Hurricane Milton. He claims her actions and statements during this crisis were not only inappropriate but also embarrassing. This criticism emphasizes a pattern of behavior that Cooke argues undermines her credibility and effectiveness in managing critical situations.

Policy and Political Judgment

Beyond specific incidents, Cooke questions Harris’s overall judgment on policy matters. He suggests that her decisions often reflect political posturing rather than the wisdom and foresight expected from a leader. This claim serves to portray her as someone who prioritizes image over substantive governance, a characterization that could resonate with voters seeking genuine leadership.

Public Perception

Cooke further contends that Harris’s behavior and public appearances contribute to a growing negative perception among the American populace. He draws a comparison to the fable of The Emperor’s New Clothes, implying that many individuals are beginning to see through Harris’s purported qualifications and abilities. This metaphor suggests a disillusioned public ready to confront the reality of her performance.

Overall Tone

The tone of Cooke’s piece is decidedly critical and dismissive, reverberating with skepticism regarding Harris’s abilities and performance. As a reflection of the conservative viewpoint presented by the National Review, the article encapsulates a broader skepticism about the Vice President’s role in the current administration.

In conclusion, Charles C. W. Cooke’s article offers a stark portrayal of Kamala Harris, raising significant questions about her intelligence and capability as Vice President. By focusing on her competence, judgment, and public perception, the article positions her as a contentious figure in contemporary American politics, inviting readers to reflect on her qualifications and effectiveness.