Skip to content

Judge fires Hunter Biden’s lawyers for dirty trick they pulled in court

Judge fires Hunter Biden’s lawyers for dirty trick they pulled in court

The federal judge presiding over Hunter Biden’s criminal case criticized defense attorneys for the dirty trick they tried to pull with his plea deal with Justice Department prosecutors.

Earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika threatened to sanction the first son’s legal team over allegations that one of his attorneys had falsely filed with the court clerk’s office. In issuing her July 28 order, Judge Noreika noted that another attorney had inadvertently released an office staff member’s personal contact information into the public record.

After prosecutors tried to obtain blanket immunity for Hunter Biden and the defense tried to scam a clerk, a judge has barred all contact with the clerk of court’s office.

“The clerk’s office of this court has many hardworking and dedicated employees,” he wrote. “They are often the public face of this Court and have to deal with many different, and often difficult, issues every day. Their job is not always easy, but they do it well. They have earned my trust and respect . I will not tolerate or stand for them to be misused, disrespected or lied to.”

Faced with these errors, the judge ordered that from now on all investigations be brought to his attention instead of the clerk’s office.

“Any such questions and inquiries shall be submitted in writing and shall be placed on the record,” he said. “Insofar as the rare case occurs where a written statement is not feasible, a telephone call may be made to my chambers by an attorney representing one of the parties in such cases or an interested third party.”

It’s obvious that the judge has lost all confidence in Biden’s defense team at this point.

The impersonation allegations arose when a member of Hunter Biden’s legal team was accused of impersonating the lawyer for House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO ), who filed an amicus brief in the case.

The impersonator, identified as Jessica Bengels of New York-based Latham and Watkins, contacted the court clerk’s office to request the removal of the information filed by Mr. Smith. However, it was revealed that the caller misrepresented his identity and affiliation in an attempt to withdraw the materials.

“The Court has discussed the matter with the relevant people in the clerk’s office and it was reported that the caller, Ms. Jessica Bengels, stated that she was working with Mr. Kittila and requested that they withdraw the amicus materials because they contained sensitive grand juror, taxpayer and social security information,” he wrote in an order.

“The caller misrepresented his identity and who he worked for in an attempt to improperly persuade the clerk’s office to remove amicus materials from the docket,” he added.

The federal judge overseeing Hunter Biden’s criminal case has issued strict contact restrictions with the court clerk’s office following allegations of impersonation and unauthorized disclosure of personal information.

U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika recently warned that sanctions could be imposed on Hunter Biden’s legal team over allegations that one of his lawyers misrepresented himself to the court clerk’s office.

During Hunter Biden’s first court appearance, he pleaded not guilty to two federal tax crimes after his deal with prosecutors fell apart. The deal would have seen him plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of significant income tax evasion for 2017 and 2018, with probation recommended by prosecutors.

Also included was a pre-trial diversion agreement intended to wipe a felony firearm charge from Biden’s record. However, Judge Noreika expressed concern about the unusual breadth of immunity provided by the diversion agreement, prompting her to postpone action on the plea agreement.

NOW READ:

Texas Republican boos mercilessly after Cheapshot: ‘Trump is running to stay out of jail’

*” Indicates mandatory fields


OPINION:
This article contains comments that reflect the opinion of the author.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish