Hunter Biden being acquitted could be a good thing and the truth about the polls [VIDEO]

In a recent discussion, former military leader Sean Parnell and established pollster Rich Baris engaged in a critical examination of election practices and recent controversies surrounding the handling of legal matters involving Hunter Biden. The conversation highlighted the importance of eliminating bias within polling methodologies and the profound impact of judicial perceptions on public sentiment.

Expressing deep concern, Parnell raised alarming suspicions about the impartiality of Hunter Biden's jury. “I'm hearing from all my people that Hunter Biden's entire jury is basically rigged in his favor. It's really no surprise to anyone. A bunch of Democrats stacked that jury,” Parnell expressed his apprehensions. He stated that a potential acquittal of Hunter Biden could shed light on perceived disparities within the justice system, especially amid contrasting approaches to various people.

How a faith-based gold company is changing the way Americans protect their retirement

Elaborating on his position, Parnell noted the Justice Department's reluctance to bring charges against Joe Biden, citing his advanced age and alleged memory problems, juxtaposed with the lack of action against Hunter Biden, while simultaneously make unfounded accusations against Trump, paintings. a worrying picture. In particular, even non-political figures like Dr. Phil have expressed reservations about the fairness of the recent legal proceedings against Trump. Public awareness of these inconsistencies is certainly growing.

Meanwhile, Baris stressed the critical importance of refining survey methodologies for greater accuracy. Rich was talking about his recent pre-verdict survey, the public's eagerness for updated data was evident. The troubling state of the Biden regime's economic policies spurred our community-funded Public Polling Project, which aims to provide reliable national polling results. He encouraged people to explore bigdatapoll.com to contribute to a more complete and accurate election landscape.

Calling attention to the deficiencies prevalent in existing survey techniques, Baris criticized the structuring of various surveys. “So, and I laugh at some of the results of these, because you've got YouGov as to whether people are waking up. I mean, they can't even bias the poll writing well enough to get a good result. They can't. It's amazing. Some of these quizzes that are being written. If you were doing, you know, studying statistics in college, or taking a survey design course, I would absolutely fail your task if you drafted and ordered a survey like that. So to see it practiced disgusts me.”

Baris emphasized the complexity of conducting polls amid contentious events, drawing parallels to the challenges faced during the 2016 election cycle. “Sean, the numbers never moved. They just didn't mean in the poll in the 72 hours and the 96 hours after that they won't vote for Trump. After the Billy Bush tape came out, that's it. They were always going to vote for him,” Baris remarked.

The insightful exchange between Parnell and Baris epitomizes the complexities inherent in objective polling practices in politically charged environments, illustrating the powerful influence of perceptions about the judiciary on public attitudes and viewpoints.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of RVM News. contact with us for guidelines for submitting your own comment.