Skip to content

Ex-Russian president says Putin has no choice but to ‘annihilate’ Zelenskyy after drone strike

A key ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin has suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky should be killed after the Kremlin claimed to have foiled a Ukrainian attack. Russian officials are reportedly labeling Zelensky and Ukraine a “terrorist regime in Kiev” and are poised to attack Zelenskyy’s home following reports that Ukraine tried to assassinate Putin.

“After today’s terrorist attack, there are no options left but the physical elimination of Zelensky and his clique,” Kremlin Security Council Vice Chairman Dmitri Medvedev, a former Russian president, wrote on social media under Putin

The incident involved “two unmanned aerial vehicles” that were shot down “without causing any casualties or damage” to the Kremlin, according to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov’s office. Putin was not in the Kremlin at the time, Peskov told state media.

“We see these actions as a planned terrorist attack and assassination attempt against the president,” Peskov’s office said. “Russia reserves the right to take countermeasures wherever and whenever it sees fit.”

JUST IN – Russia says Ukraine tried to hit Kremlin with drones overnight in an assassination attempt on

— (@disclosetv) May 3, 2023

Medvedev also said that Putin now has no choice but to “annihilate” (or “remove”) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Ukrainian officials denied carrying out such an operation and suggested the incident could have been perpetrated by Russian dissidents, if not orchestrated by the government. Zelensky told reporters while traveling in Finland: “We are not attacking Putin or Moscow. We are fighting on our territory. We are defending our towns and cities. We don’t have enough weapons for that. That’s why we don’t use it anywhere [else]. For us, this is a deficit. We can’t spend it. And we didn’t attack Putin. we leave it [a] court”.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken expressed skepticism about the Russian accusations, but maintained that they do not know what really happened. “I cannot validate them in any way; we just don’t know,” Blinken said during a Washington Post live event. “And it’s very difficult to comment or speculate on that without really knowing what the facts are.”

Zelensky’s team suggested that Putin would use the incident to justify a retaliatory operation. “Russia is clearly preparing a large-scale terrorist attack,” Ukrainian presidential adviser Mikhailo Podolyak tweeted. “Ukraine is waging an exclusively defensive war and does not attack targets on the territory of the Russian Federation. For what? This does not solve any military problem.”

The drone strike comes after Russia launched missile strikes on Kiev in late April. Ukrainian defenses activated air defense systems and issued air raid alerts. Explosions were heard in the region, and the Kyiv regional administration issued a message on Telegram saying: “Air defenses are working!”

Meanwhile, Britain has confirmed the delivery of depleted uranium rounds to Ukraine. Deputy Defense Minister James Gippy told MP Kenny MacAskill: “We have sent thousands of Challenger 2 rounds to Ukraine, including depleted uranium armor-piercing rounds. For reasons of operational security, we will not comment on the utilization rates of the kits supplied.” .

Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. condemned the escalation.

“In another reckless escalation, Britain has confirmed the delivery of depleted uranium munitions to Ukraine,” RFK Jr. said. “DU munitions should be banned. They partially vaporize on impact, poisoning the environment with uranium dust that causes cancer and horrific birth defects.

Reckless escalation appears to be continuing from all sides in the Russia-Ukraine military conflict, which has drawn major powers from around the world. Under Biden’s presidency, the risk of another world war has reached its highest point since the Cuban Missile Crisis.

*” Indicates mandatory fields

This article contains comments that reflect the opinion of the author.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *