Skip to content

Even The New York Times Is Now Calling For Feinstein To Resign

The New York Times is calling for Senator Dianne Feinstein to resign from the Senate. This follows her extended absence from the Senate, which has negatively impacted legislation and judicial nominees. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind the call for her resignation, the impact of her absence, and what this means for the future of the Senate.

Background: Who is Senator Feinstein?

Dianne Feinstein is a Democratic senator from California. She was first elected to the Senate in 1992 and has been re-elected five times since then. Feinstein has served on various committees, including the Senate Intelligence Committee, the Senate Judiciary Committee, and the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Her Distinguished Career

The New York Times has stated that Feinstein has had a “distinguished career.” She has been a strong advocate for gun control, women’s rights, and environmental protection. During her time in the Senate, Feinstein has sponsored and co-sponsored legislation that has focused on these issues.

Feinstein has also been a prominent voice in the investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election. As the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Feinstein played a key role in the confirmation of Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

The Call for Resignation

However, Feinstein’s recent absence from the Senate has led to concerns about her ability to fulfill her responsibilities as a senator. Feinstein has not been in attendance since February 27th, citing health issues.

The New York Times editorial board has now called for her resignation, stating that Feinstein’s absences are holding up legislation and judicial nominees. The board argues that Feinstein should resign and turn her responsibilities over to an appointed successor if she cannot fulfill her obligations to the Senate and her constituents.

The board also argues that if Feinstein cannot make the decision to step down on her own, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and other Democrats should make it clear to her and the public that she must resign. The board asserts that senators have a “primary and inescapable duty” to show up and vote, and that if they cannot do so for extended periods, they are depriving their constituents of representation.

Impact of Feinstein’s Absence

Feinstein’s extended absence from the Senate has had a significant impact on legislation and judicial nominees. With the Senate evenly split, her absence has deprived Californians and American voters of full representation on appointments and legislation.

Furthermore, her absence has made it difficult to pass legislation, as Democrats need every vote they can get. With important legislation such as voting rights and infrastructure on the line, Feinstein’s absence has become increasingly problematic.

In addition, judicial nominees have been left in limbo, as the Senate Judiciary Committee cannot advance nominees without the support of all committee members. This has led to delays in filling important judicial vacancies, which in turn has affected the justice system, particularly in the Ninth Circuit, where California is located.

What This Means for the Future of the Senate

Feinstein’s absence has raised serious concerns about the role of absentee senators in the Senate. While it is not uncommon for senators to miss votes due to illness or other reasons, an extended absence like Feinstein’s has a significant impact on the workings of the Senate.

The Senate relies on its members to show up and cast their votes. Without every senator present, legislation and judicial nominees cannot move forward. This can have disastrous consequences for the Senate and for the American people, as important issues are left unresolved.

The call for Feinstein’s resignation has also highlighted the need for the Senate to address the issue of absenteeism. Senators who cannot fulfill their duties should step down and make way for an appointed successor. The Senate should have clear guidelines in place for addressing absenteeism and ensuring that all senators are able to fulfill their responsibilities.

Conclusion

Dianne Feinstein’s extended absence from the Senate has prompted a call for her resignation from the New York Times editorial board. The impact of her absence on legislation and judicial nominees has been significant, and her continued absence could have serious consequences for the Senate and the American people.

It is clear that the Senate needs to address the issue of absenteeism and ensure that all senators are able to fulfill their responsibilities. Senators who cannot do so should step down and make way for an appointed successor. The Senate should have clear guidelines in place for addressing absenteeism, as it is essential that all senators be present and active in order to effectively serve their constituents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish