We need your help! Join our growing army and click here to subscribe to Revolver without ads. Or give a single or recurring one donation during this critical moment.
If you ask the Democrats, there is absolutely no voter fraud to speak of. And even if it does exist, they argue that it is so insignificant that it could not possibly affect any US election. That’s their mantra, and they’ve been beating that drum tirelessly. But now, suddenly, American elections aren’t so fair after all, especially when it comes to Democratic mayoral primaries that are packed with ballots. So much so that a Connecticut judge has ordered a new primary.
A state judge has taken the unusual step of ordering a new Democratic mayoral primary in Connecticut’s largest city after the Nov. 7 general election is completed. The decision comes after surveillance videos showed a woman wrapping what appeared to be absentee ballots in an outdoor ballot box days before the original primary.
Superior Court Judge William Clark ruled that allegations of possible warrant embezzlement threw out the results of the Sept. 12 primary, which Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim won by 251 of the 8,173 votes cast. Absentee ballots ensured his margin of victory.
“The volume of such mishandled ballots is such that it casts doubt on the outcome of the primary election and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate outcome of the primary,” Clark wrote in his ruling, adding that the videos “They are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all parties.”
The new primary date has not yet been set.
Despite the judge’s call for new primaries, it is expected that the general elections will continue as planned. Ganim will appear as a Democratic candidate while Gomes will appear as an independent candidate. Republican David Herz and petitioner candidate Lamond Daniels are also running for mayor.
Ganim’s opponent, John Gomes, whose campaign obtained the surveillance video and released it publicly after the primary, sued city officials and demanded a new primary, or be declared the winner.
This appears to be just another case of “vote harvesting”. Under Connecticut law, voters who use a drop box must drop off their completed ballots themselves or designate specific family members, police officers, local election officials or caregivers to do it for them. Many believe this is the exact formula Democrats used in the 2018 California midterms, the 2020 national elections, and the 2022 national elections. For them, it’s a “winning” formula.
READ MORE: Several New Jersey Democrats charged with felony voter fraud involving mail-in ballots…
It’s ironic. There were numerous videos and affidavits alleging fraud in the 2020 and 2022 elections, but judge after judge seemed to ignore them. However, the moment the fraud game hits the Democrats, new elections are quickly ordered. Clearly, this latest vote-rigging scandal completely undermines the “safe and fair” election narrative. If Democrats can rig their own primaries, imagine how good they are at rigging everything else.
SUPPORT REVOLVER — TO GIVE — SUBSCRIBE — NEWS SERVICE — GAB — GETTR — SOCIAL TRUTH — TWITTER
Español de Venezuela 
English 