Democrats Pose the Greatest Threat to the Constitution

The American Conservative’s article titled Democrats Are the Biggest Danger to the Constitution delves into perceived threats posed by the Democratic Party to the U.S. Constitution, especially in the context of the upcoming 2024 presidential election.

Threats to the Constitution

The article asserts that a potential Kamala Harris presidency would significantly endanger the foundational principles of American governance as enshrined in the Constitution. It posits that Harris’s policy platform is fundamentally antagonistic to the current constitutional framework.

Supreme Court Reforms

Harris’s support for President Biden’s proposed Supreme Court reforms is a particular concern. The article views these reforms as an effort to weaken judicial oversight, thereby allowing future Democratic administrations to bypass constitutional constraints and expand executive power.

Enumerated Powers

Critics argue that the Democratic Party demonstrates a lack of regard for the Constitution’s enumerated powers. The article claims that Democrats often justify their actions as being for the public good, thereby undermining the constitutional mandate for achieving broad consensus before implementing significant changes.

Senate Filibuster

If Harris is elected alongside Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress, there is a high likelihood that the Senate filibuster could be eliminated. This procedural change would enable Democrats to pass legislation with a simple majority, potentially leading to lasting defeats for conservatives on key issues such as abortion and immigration.

Media and Institutional Opposition

The article contrasts the scrutiny that would face actions taken by Trump with the likely leniency towards Harris. It contends that major national institutions, including the press and courts, would oppose Trump’s initiatives strenuously, while a Harris administration might encounter considerably less institutional resistance.

Historical Context and Comparisons

Historical comparisons are drawn between past political leadership issues, such as the Iraq War, and more recent events like January 6. The article notes that although some Democrats, like Jim Webb, have exhibited conservative tendencies, this is far from the norm within the party.

Election Stakes and Unpredictability

The article acknowledges the unpredictability inherent in any election due to variables such as economic recessions, terrorist threats, and pandemics. Nevertheless, it emphasizes the necessity for voters to base their decisions on individual preferences, despite these uncertainties.

In sum, the article presents a critical viewpoint on the Democratic Party’s approach to constitutional governance and delineates the potential consequences of a Kamala Harris presidency for the future of the U.S. political system.