Breaking: Speaker Johnson’s Office Refutes Claims He Instructed Senate Republicans to Remove SAVE Act from Funding Proposal Following House Approval

In a developing story concerning the ongoing negotiations over government funding, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has faced allegations that he directed Senate Republicans to eliminate the SAVE Act from funding legislation post-House approval. This comes amid heightened tensions as the deadline for government funding looms at the end of September.

Allegations Against Speaker Johnson

Recent claims from senior aides in two GOP U.S. Senate offices assert that Speaker Johnson conveyed instructions to remove the SAVE Act from the upcoming government funding bill after it passed in the House. These allegations have created a stir among both parties, stirring skepticism regarding Johnson’s intentions in the ongoing legislative battle.

Overview of the SAVE Act

The SAVE Act is a pivotal piece of Republican legislation aimed at fortifying electoral integrity by preventing noncitizens, particularly illegal aliens, from participating in U.S. elections. Johnson has publicly backed the initiative, positioning it as a key component of the government’s funding agenda. Despite his support, the act faces substantial hurdles, particularly from the Democrat-controlled Senate and President Joe Biden, who has indicated a willingness to veto any such legislation.

Challenges in Passing the SAVE Act

Within the walls of Congress, the SAVE Act is contending with notable opposition, not only from Democrats but also from within the GOP-controlled House. Many party members have expressed hesitance in rallying firmly behind the measure, placing additional pressure on Johnson as he seeks to navigate these contentious waters.

Potential Government Shutdown

The implications of failing to secure a funding agreement are significant. Experts warn that a stalemate over the inclusion of the SAVE Act could result in a government shutdown, an outcome that would disrupt services and have wide-ranging effects on the American public. Time is of the essence, as lawmakers race against the clock with the funding deadline fast approaching.

Strategy and Criticism

Citing the alleged instruction to gut the SAVE Act post-House approval, Senate GOP aides have criticized Johnson’s tactics as a possible bait-and-switch maneuver. This growing skepticism raises concerns about the Speaker’s genuine commitment to advocating for the SAVE Act and may influence his standing among conservative members and constituents.

Continuing Resolution (CR) and Future Plans

Amid these challenges, Johnson has proposed a Continuing Resolution (CR) to maintain government funding at current levels through the end of the calendar year and into March 2025. This strategy aims to create opportunities for Republicans to address their legislative priorities, particularly if they achieve a GOP trifecta in the forthcoming legislative session.

Johnson’s Leadership and Future

As the Speaker of the House, Johnson’s leadership is under scrutiny. Having previously faced a vote to vacate his position, which was saved by Democratic votes, his authority remains fragile. The upcoming elections may further complicate his tenure, increasing the urgency to solidify his position on key issues like the SAVE Act.

Denial from Johnson’s Office

In response to these allegations, a spokesperson for Johnson, Taylor Haulsee, issued a categorical denial, reaffirming that Johnson is dedicated to safeguarding the integrity of American elections. Haulsee urged all Republicans to unite in this effort, signaling Johnson’s commitment to the legislative fight ahead.

As the situation unfolds, all eyes remain on Speaker Johnson and the critical negotiations that could set the tone for this legislative session and beyond.