On Thursday, Michigan lawmakers following the lead of Republican state Rep. James DeSana introduced articles of impeachment today in a House resolution co-sponsored by Neil Friske (R- 107th District), Joseph Fox (R- 101st District), Rachelle Smit (R -43rd District), Matt Maddock (R-51st District), Steve Carra (R-36th District), Josh Schriver (R-66th District), Angela Rigas (R-79th District).
“The House of Representatives has the sole power to remove civilian officials for corrupt conduct in office. Attorney General Nessel has clearly violated the ethical standards of conduct of the Attorney General’s office,” DeSana said.
Representative DeSana presented three articles of impeachment in his resolution.
Three articles are included in its resolution:
Article I claims that Nessel violated his constitutional oath by failing to faithfully perform the duties of his office by failing to charge any of the individuals responsible for falsifying and submitting fraudulent voter registrations in Muskegon.
Article I describes how MI AG Dana Nessel failed in his duties and abused his position as Attorney General. She has not charged those responsible for the “clearly fraudulent” voter registration applications uncovered in a joint investigation involving her office in October 2020.
Not only did AG Nessel and SOS Benson fail to mention the state investigation into voter registration fraud, but no charges were filed against those involved despite the conclusion of SOS Investigator Corey Ames and Police Department Det. of Muskegon, as detailed in the MSP report, that at least 18 of the registration requests shown were “clearly fraudulent.”
The Gateway Pundit uncovered an alleged fraudulent voter registration ring, including “disturbing items found in leased office space in Southfield, MI, that was used by GBI Strategies (allegedly owned and operated at the time by Gary Bell). Inside the room were burner phones, prepaid and reloadable cards used to pay employees, semi-automatic rifles with suppressors and modified handguns. A chalkboard in the room where the weapons were found read appeared the heading ‘Hot Topics’ Under the heading were the words ‘weapons in the field, ready for shifts’.
Police officers found guns, silencers, prepaid cash cards and burner phones at the GBI Strategies office.
Article II alleges “misappropriation of office and malicious prosecution of the 16 Republican electors of Michigan.”
The second article is about AG Nessel charging 16 MI GOP electors who cast an alternate list of electoral votes for President Trump in 2020 with 8 felonies each. All but two of the voters are seniors, and many live on fixed incomes. After the DOJ declined to take the case against the voters, and the Ingham County DA called his case against them “weak,” AG Dana Nessel moved forward with his plans to indict the his political enemies with charges that, if he could prove successful, he would. for many of them they are equivalent to life imprisonment.
From the impeachment resolution of Dana Nessel:
He has also filed felony charges against 16 people who signed a “Certificate of Votes of 2020 Michigan Electors” and purported to vote as electors for the Republican candidates for president and vice president when their own statements indicate that the element of ‘specific intent. of the crimes charged, the intent to defraud cannot be proven; now, therefore, be it resolved by the House of Representatives that Dana M. Nessel, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, be impeached for corrupt conduct in office. The following articles of impeachment are adopted by the House of Representatives and will be presented to the Senate.
On July 18, 2023, when AG Nessel announced the charges against the 16 MI GOP surrogate electors, he made it clear that the crux of his case rested on the fact that the electors knew Trump had lost the election when they cast your alternate list. of electoral votes for him, but they did it anyway.
However, AG Nessel appeared as a guest at a liberal online event on September 22, where she completely refuted her own accusations against voters. Nessel responded naively, when asked about the Michigan Republican voters against whom she is jointly charged with eight felonies, who were certain that President Trump had won the 2020 election. “They legitimately believe that,” she said. and added that “Ingham County, where Lansing is located, is an extremely liberal county,” implying that Republican voters would not be able to get a fair trial. In essence, he admitted that the voters’ chances of winning his case would be very slim because of the “extremely, extremely liberal district” in which he chose to try them.
Steve Bannon, Newt Gingrich, Hollywood producer and actor Nick Searcy, former Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake and Trump lawyer John Eastman were among the prominent conservative figures who participated in the Telethon Save the Electors. So far, the campaign has raised just under $156,000 in a GiveSendGo account, which is currently being investigated by the same lawless attorney general who charged each voter with eight felonies. The funds are distributed equally among the legal representatives of 15 of the 16 voters who are financing their own defense.
Former Trump lawyer John Eastman, who is also tasked with defending President Trump, explains why it is critical that Americans not capitulate to the far left, which is threatening and intimidating conservatives to speak out against a tyrannical rule through the use of legal tactics.
Eastman warned during his Save the Electors Telethon appearance that Democrats, including Attorney General Nessel, are targeting middle-class people, threatening to destroy their financial stability and life savings if they dare to question the outcome of one of the most controversial elections in American history.
Article III refers to allegations of corruption on the closing of a criminal case. Next follows:
On July 13, 2022, an article published in The Detroit News alleged that Traci Kornak, the legal guardian of a person living in an assisted living facility, had improperly billed an insurance company for the attention provided to his ward. Joe LeBlanc, now former executive director of the facility known as The Village of Heather Hills, alleged that Kornak had used the facility’s taxpayer identification number and federal employer identification number without his permission, and that he falsely stated that the person providing these services: later revealed to be Kornak’s daughter; she was an employee of the facility. The article said that over two years, Kornak billed the insurance company nearly $50,000 for that care.
Attorney General Dana M. Nessel immediately expressed interest in the article, asking members of her staff if they should investigate this and asking them to keep her updated on the matter. In response to Nessel’s interest, the Financial Crimes Section of the Criminal Investigation Division of the Attorney General’s Department began an investigation into Kornak.
During that investigation, Scott Teter, division chief of the financial crimes division, became concerned about a conflict of interest presented by the past professional relationship between Nessel and Kornak. In 2018, Kornak helped with Nessel’s transition into office after she was elected attorney general. Teter believed it would “create the appearance of impropriety for AG Nessel to access information about this investigation.” “Specifically, if the Attorney General’s Department declined to seek charges against the suspect, it could appear that the professional relationship between Attorney General Nessel and Traci Kornak had influenced the investigation.” For this reason, he has asked “that a wall of conflict be established to prevent Attorney General Nessel from providing or accessing any information related to this investigation.” The notice establishing this wall of conflict was distributed to all staff members of the Attorney General’s Department on September 7, 2022.
As of December 2022, this conflicting wall was still active. In a Dec. 2 email, employees were reminded that “[e]excludes Attorney General Dana Nessel from access to the . . . files in this matter.” On December 5, employees assigned to the case discussed closing the case, but one employee was still reviewing the matter. That same day, however, Aubrey Sargent, Chief of Investigations for the Division of ‘Criminal Investigations, emailed four reports on the Kornak case to Attorney General Nessel, in apparent disregard of the wall of conflict.
On December 6, Attorney General Nessel sent an email to Sargent and Attorney General Fadwa Hammoud regarding this case. Nessel testified that Kornak had contacted her seeking documents from the investigation, because the allegations against her were holding up a possible court date for Kornak in Kent County. Nessel communicated his belief that Kornak “wants to be able to state that the claims were made . . . they were never substantiated by our investigation and the case is closed.” Nessel also wrote, “There is some urgency in the matter because he must provide this information by the end of the week.” The next day, Nessel sent the reports on Kornak’s investigation to Chief Deputy Attorney General Christina Grossi.
Although staff members of the Department of the Attorney General of the Generalitat considered closing this investigation at the end of September 2022 and it was discussed again on 2 December, the investigation was not formally closed until at least 19 December , when the staff member assigned to the matter wrote a brief. memorandum where it “recommends[ed] closing this investigation.” This sentence indicates that the investigation was still officially open before that date. Thus, the investigation was closed long after the attorney general had communicated with case staff about Kornak’s urgent interest to be able to report that the investigation had been closed There is no way of knowing what influence this had on the staff member’s December 19 recommendation to close the investigation.
Attorney General Nessel created at least the appearance of impropriety by communicating with staff members involved in the investigation of Kornak, Nessel’s former partner, before the investigation was formally closed. Regardless of whether Nessel’s actions violated the particular terms of the conflict wall, she should not have contacted the staff members assigned to the matter to communicate Kornak’s interest in having the investigation quickly closed so that she could secure a judicial appointment. Writing that “[t]there is some urgency to the matter here” could have pressured Nessel employees to close the file quickly, without further review.
Therefore, Dana M. Nessel, for this conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.; and be it further resolved, in accordance with Article XI, Section 7 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, that the House of Representatives shall proceed to elect three members of its own body whose duty it shall be to prosecute this complaint and that these members are authorized and empowered to prepare and present the Statutes of accusation adopted by this resolution.
NOW READ:
Fulton County defense attorneys move to withdraw amid 2020 ballot questions
English 
Español de Venezuela 