Renewing a warrantless surveillance tool without reform, despite its alleged misuse by intelligence officials to spy on Americans, was not necessary to combat terrorist attacks, supporters said. experts at the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) passed senate i house this week with bipartisan support com former intelligence officials raised concerns about national security risks due to its expiration. However, there are alternative methods to stop terrorism without resorting to it warrantless surveillance of US citizens, national security experts told the DCNF.
“I think it's ridiculous [that people say its expiration would be dangerous]” Retired Air Force Col. Rob Maness told the DCNF. “The need for FISA, given the weaponization of this court, is questionable, frankly… Especially the 702 reauthorization so the FBI can do warrantless surveillance of American citizens, which must go, and frankly, all the arguments. [are] typical of the one-party establishment people in Washington, DC who want to use scare tactics.”
The imminent expiry of FISA in late December encouraged lawmakers to become victims of coercion through intimidation, Center for Security Policy Senior Strategy Analyst J. Michael Waller told DCNF.
“What we saw in Congress is your typical Chicken Little FBI briefing at the last minute to scare congressmen into keeping the status quo or expanding the FBI's powers,” Waller told the DCNF . “This happens all the time, Congress falls in love all the time. And this kind of thing has to stop.”
“There are really important elements of the FISA law that benefit us as a country and that don't infringe on our constitutional rights and that don't empower the bad elements of the government, and those things need to be preserved,” Waller said. the DCNF.
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee recently questioned FBI Director Christopher Wray on Alleged FISA Section 702 Abuse and Wray said the FBI has already put in place reforms to stop them. Lee testified that the FBI always makes this claim, but never changes or shows evidence, leaving him with no basis for trusting the agency.
“You never said to the FBI, 'Yes, there have been problems in this regard, we want to work with Congress to address those problems,'” Waller told the DCNF.
Dozens of former intelligence officials, including several who signed a letter questioning the authenticity of Hunter Biden's laptop ahead of the 2020 presidential election, pushed Congress on Tuesday. letter not to let FISA Section 702 expire or implement reforms that would limit surveillance authorities.
“We cannot harm America's intelligence community either by not renewing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act or by limiting it in a way that would make it harder for the government to protect Americans,” he says the letter. “To be clear, Section 702 saves American lives and helps keep Americans safe from international terrorist attacks, foreign cyberattacks, overseas suppliers of fentanyl, and other threats to our national security. There is no has substituted for it.”
During the Crossfire Hurricane investigation started in 2016, which assessed whether Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, which the FBI requested FISA warrants to conduct surveillance against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The FBI subpoenaed the now discredited Steele Dossierwhich alleged that Trump had connections to Russia, extensively in his FISA applications, although investigators were unable to verify any of the claims that his campaign conspired with Russia.
“Even with an abuse that led to surveillance of the Trump campaign it's enough for me to say it's absolutely worthless,” Maness told the DCNF. “It's the antithesis of everything that the United States of America stands for … and we need to get rid of it. There's no doubt in my mind that it's far more harmful to the United States of America than it's ever helped.” .
The FBI pointed to the DCNF in Wray's recent opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “[Section] 702 is key to our ability to detect a foreign terrorist organization overseas directing an agent here to carry out an attack in our backyard, and inquiries from people in the United States, in particular, can provide the critical link that allows us to identify the target or intended target. build the network of attackers so we can stop them before they attack and kill Americans,” Wray said.
The office declined to comment on how many terrorist attacks FISA Section 702 has foiled.
“In fact, when you ask the question, you're never going to get a clear answer as to exactly which terrorist attacks have been stopped by the use of the system, particularly on the 702 side,” Maness told the DCNF.
The FBI conducted nearly 5 million searches on Americans from 2019 to 2022, and “there was little apparent justification” for them. seconds to a September report by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.
“The Administration likes to talk a lot about the overall value of Section 702 when it comes to foreign intelligence. But what they haven't done is argue that whatever the overall intelligence value of Section 702 is , such as restricting searches of Americans and the other reforms we have proposed would harm national security,” Kia Hamadanchy, senior federal policy adviser. with the ACLU, he told the DCNF.
“They have engaged in a false dichotomy as if the question is whether we end 702 or leave it as is, when the real question is whether requiring a warrant for American person inquiries and other reforms undermines the value of the program “. Hamadanchy added. “And they haven't made that case.”
FISA Section 702 is important, but could still be effective without violating Americans' privacy, Noah Chauvinattorney for the Liberty National Security Program at the Brennan Center and former intelligence adviser in the Office of the General Counsel at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, told the DCNF.
“I think the administration has done a pretty decent job of demonstrating that Section 702 has intelligence value. And they've provided some declassified examples of how they've used it as part of successful counterterrorism operations,” he said. said Chauvin. “What we haven't seen is any evidence that any common-sense reforms that civil society or Congress are pushing to protect Americans' privacy would make Section 702 any less effective as a tool against terrorism.” .
All republished articles must include our logo, the name of our reporter and their affiliation with DCNF. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact us [email protected].
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you're sick of letting radical tech execs, bogus fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals, and the lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news, consider donating to BPR to help us fight back them. Now is the time. The truth has never been more critical!
Success! Thanks for donating. Please share BPR content to help fight lies.
We have zero tolerance for comments that contain violence, racism, profanity, profanity, doxing, or rude behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it, click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for engaging with us in a fruitful conversation.
English 
Español de Venezuela 